was bound, irrespective of whether she had read the document or - TopicsExpress



          

was bound, irrespective of whether she had read the document or not. The question of notice was irrele- vant in such a case. coMMENT: The decision in LEstrangev Graucob illus- trates both the operation of the parol evidence rule limitations placed upon the defence ofnon est and the factum (see Chapter 17, pp. 418-19) It is also probably worth noting that this type of exclusion clause today would contravene s 64 of the Australian Consumer Law.
Posted on: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:19:47 +0000

Trending Topics



at day shall this song be sung in the land

Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015