3.0 A string fails all the requirements necessary to qualify as an object But let’s not waste our time waiting for the string theorists to come up with their 1-D worm. There are so many conceptual errors with this perfectly flat, 1-D object that I hardly know where to begin. Let’s just briefly run through some of the basic errors that string theorists make when conceptualizing architecture just to show you that they don’t understand the scientific method and to reinforce that a string is a logical impossibility. a. In Physics, in the real world, in Science, there is no such thing as a 1-D object, especially a1-D object that looks like a tube. All tubes and cylinders that I know of are 3-D. You would think that string theorists were introduced to basic geometry in elementary school. Then again, that was a long time ago I guess. We cannot imagine let alone illustrate a 1D object. Anything that has zero thickness is called empty space! There is no stand-alone object that anyone can imagine which only has height. b. Proponents of the string cannot even imagine a medium that can possibly contain and contour their hypothetical ‘length’. Can space enclose that which has only length?
Posted on: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:58:21 +0000
Trending Topics
© 2015