3. Consider First Reading of Revised Policy KG - TopicsExpress



          

3. Consider First Reading of Revised Policy KG (Electioneering): Ms. Anzaldi reported she had attended a meeting where various community members spent a lot of time considering this. They reviewed the logistics of where they wanted the roped-off section/stakes to be placed so people would not be interfering with drop off and pick up. It was the consensus that electioneers should be about 75’ from the school – this will allow people to still be in a populated area, but not interfering with drop off and pick up. A portable fence would be placed; it would keep them away from the school parking lot and away from the students. It was noted that the School Principal is “good with it.” It was Mr. Bradley’s opinion that electioneering should not be held during school hours, that it is too unsafe, opens up too many problems, and he is not comfortable with it. He noted the town is trying to stay away from electioneering near the building. Mr. Nemeth suggested if the town had an opinion about it he would like them to bring it to the School Board. Mr. Bradley said he does not believe the town and Selectmen want the electioneers anywhere near the building. He said we should keep them away from the school, he does not want people standing out here with picket signs. Comment was made that we do not have to allow it. Ms. Anzaldi stated the court can still vote it down. She noted at the meeting it had been suggested to allow electioneering 75’ to 100’ away from the Whitney Center – the same for the school, so it would not be interfering with the parking lot or the flow of traffic. She noted Selectman Thompson was at the meeting and was “alright with it.” Mr. Bradley stated he wants no electioneering during school hours. Mr. Nemeth felt it seems to be a reasonable compromise and teaches the kids about Civics and about freedom of speech. Motion made by Mr. Nemeth, second by Mr. Kearns, that the Board approve the language for Revised Policy KG (Electioneering) at first reading. Motion carried with 4 votes in the affirmative and Mr. Bradley voting in the negative.
Posted on: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 13:59:22 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015