80 Year Old Freedom Fighters Widow - Mohini Kamwani - Files a Rs. - TopicsExpress



          

80 Year Old Freedom Fighters Widow - Mohini Kamwani - Files a Rs. 20 Crore Criminal Writ Petition Case - in Bombay High Court - on - 2 Bombay High Court Sitting Judges - Justice P V Hardas & Justice Ms. Mridula Bhatkar ►►►IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY◄◄◄ CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2014 Dist: Thane IN THE MATTER OF UNJUSTIFIED ARREST AND DETENTION AND NO ACTION TAKEN BY THE LD. RESPONDENT JUDGES SHRI P V HARDAS AND SMT. MRIDULA BHATKAR AGAINST GUILTY POLICE OFFICERS TO PROTECT THEM AND IN THE MATTER OF CONTEMPT OF HON’BLE SUPREME COURT’S GUIDELINES IN D. K. BASU’S CASE AND NO ACTION TAKEN BY THE LD. RESPONDENT JUDGES SHRI P V HARDAS AND SMT. MRIDULA BHATKAR AGAINST GUILTY POLICE OFFICERS TO PROTECT THEM AND IN THE MATTER OF FORGERY, PERJURY COMMITTED AND FALSE CASES, REPORTS, AFFIDAVITS FILED BY GUILTY POLICE OFFICERS AND NO ACTION TAKEN BY THE LD. RESPONDENT JUDGES SHRI P V HARDAS AND SMT. MRIDULA BHATKAR AGAINST GUILTY POLICE OFFICERS TO PROTECT THEM AND IN THE MATTER OF WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND IN THE MATTER OF GRANTING COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONERS AND IN THE MATTER OF SECTIONS 217, 218, 219, 201, 191, 192, 193, 200, 465, 466, 471, 474, r/w. SECTION 120-B OF INDIAN PENAL CODE AND IN THE MATTER OF SECTIONS 340, 344 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE AND IN THE MATTER OF INITIATING APPROPRIATE ACTION AGAINST LD. RESPONDENT JUDGES SHRI P V HARDAS AND SMT. JUSTICE MRIDULA BHATKAR FOR PASSING A BIASED AND FRAUDULENT FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER DATED 13-6-2013 IN Crim. WP No. 1857/2012 TO PROTECT GUILTY POLICE OFFICERS 1. Mohini Naraindas Kamwani ) 2. Dilip Naraindas Kamwani ) Address – 101, Mauli, 1st Floor, A-Wing, ) Plot No. 29-C, Sector 4, Vashi, ) Navi Mumbai 400703 ) MOB - 9920412577 – RES. TEL - 022-27823443 ) EMAIL - mohini.kamwani@gmail ) …Petitioners …….V/S…… 1) Shri P V Hardas ) Judge, Bombay High Court, ) Fort, Fountain, Mumbai 400001. ) 2) Smt. Mridula Bhatkar ) Judge, Bombay High Court, ) Fort, Fountain, Mumbai 400001. ) 3) Hon. Registrar General, ) Bombay High Court, ) Fort, Fountain, Mumbai 400001. ) 4) Hon. Chief Justice, ) Bombay High Court, ) Fort, Fountain, Mumbai 400001. ) 5) CBI Director, ) Room No. 114, North Block, ) New Delhi 110001. ) 6) CBI Joint Director - Zone-I, ) Tanna House, Nathalal Pareekh Marg, ) Mumbai 400039. ) 7) State of Maharashtra, ) through Govt. Pleader. ) Bombay High Court, ) Fort, Fountain, Mumbai 400001. 8). Union of India )…Respondents PRAYERS: It is therefore most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction and further be pleased to : i) To hold and declare that the said Final Judgment Order dated 13-6-2012 Passed by Respondents No. 1 and 2, Ld. Judges Mr. P.V. Hardas and Ms. Mridula Bhatkar is Biased and Fraudulent due to non Prosecution of 4 Guilty Police officers as per the Law for our Unjustified and Illegal Arrest and Detention, Violations of D K Basu SC 1997 Arrest Guidelines, Forgery, Perjury, False Affidavits, etc. and Contempt of Hon. SC and Hon. SC Directives DESPITE clear Prayers by the Petitioner; ii) To direct initiation of appropriate Prosecution against Respondents No. 1 and 2, Ld. Judges Mr. P.V. Hardas and Ms. Mridula Bhatkar u/s 217, 218, 219, 201, 191, 192, 193, 200, 465, 466, 471, 474, r/w. Section 120-B Of Indian Penal Code; iii) Grant Interim Compensation of Rs. 2 Crore to Petitioner as compensation of damages for hardship caused due to unlawful acts by Respondents No. 1 and 2, Ld. Judges Mr. P.V. Hardas and Ms. Mridula Bhatkar; iv) Take suo motu cognizance of Contempt of Hon’ble Supreme Court’s direction in D.K.Basu’s case Para 36 by Respondents No. 1 and 2, Ld. Judges Mr. P.V. Hardas and Ms. Mridula Bhatkar for Not issuing Directions for Dismissal of Guilty Police officers for our Illegal Arrest and Jailing and Not initiating Contempt of Hon. Supreme Court Proceedings against Police and try and punish Respondents No.1 and 2 under Contempt of Courts act; v) Grant ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (iii); vi) That the Petitioner has not filed any similar Writ Petition in this Hon. Bom. High Court or Hon. Supreme Court; vii) Direct Respondent No. 3, Registrar General of Bombay High Court to initiate Criminal Prosecution under Sec. 167, 466,193,191 etc of I.P.C. against Respondents No. 1 and 2, Ld. Judges Mr. P.V. Hardas and Ms. Mridula Bhatkar, and also - as per the Letter of Ministry of Law and Justice sent to Hon. Bom. HC Registrar General dated 02 June 2014, Ref No – L – 19017 / 14 / 2013 – Jus. on Hon. President’s Office forwarding my Complaint to Dept of Justice as per my Grievances Regtn. No. PRESEC / E / 2014 / 05517 of 21 March 2014 under CPGRAMS Portal; viii) CBI Director be directed to register F.I.R. against Respondents No. 1 and 2, Ld. Judges Mr. P.V. Hardas and Ms. Mridula Bhatkar u/s. 217, 218, 219, 201, 191, 192, 193, 200, 465, 466, 471, 474, r/w. Sec. 120-B of Indian Penal Code; ix) Direct Respondent No. 4 Hon’ble Chief Justice Bombay High Court to transfer Respondents No. 1 and 2, Ld. Judges Mr. P.V. Hardas and Ms. Mridula Bhatkar out of Maharashtara State till the enquiry/investigation of the matter in order to ensure free and fair enquiry as per law down in 2014 Cr.L.J.9 (SC); x) Since the misbehavior, Criminal offences, incapacity, illegality, malafides and biasness of Respondents No. 1 and 2, Ld. Judges Mr. P.V. Hardas and Ms. Mridula Bhatkar are ex-facially proved therefore, they be directed to resign from their posts in view of law laid down by 5-Judge Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of K. Veerswami –vs- Union of India 1991 (3) S.C.C. 655; xi) If Respondents No. 1 and 2, Ld. Judges Mr. P.V. Hardas and Ms. Mridula Bhatkar fail to resign within 7 days then appropriate direction be issued for the forwarding reference for impeachment proceeding against Respondents No. 1 and 2, Ld. Judges Mr. P.V. Hardas and Ms. Mridula Bhatkar for their proved misbehavour, incapacity to act as High Court Judge and biased treatment to 79 year old senior citizen widow of freedom fighter petitioner and also violating the mandate of article 14 of the constitution about equality before law and equal protection of the law; xii) Hon. Bom. HC Registrar General be directed to seize the records of the case; xiii) The C.B.I. be directed to collect the mobile phone details of all the accused involved in the conspiracy; xiv) That the Petitioner is seeking Compensation of Rs. 20 Crore with an Interim Relief of Rs. 2 Crore, but Reserving her Other Rights for which the petitioner is filing this Crim. WP and also she is filing a Private Complaint for Defamation under the Torts Law in the appropriate Court; xv) Grant appropriate costs to the Poor Petitioners for this Petition; xvi) Grant any other relief in the interest of justice; Place: Mumbai Date: 27-10-2014 FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS AND JUSTICE THE PETITIONERS WILL ALWAYS REMAIN GRATEFUL. Mohini Naraindas Kamwani – PETITIONER-IN-PERSON NO. 1 Dilip Naraindas Kamwani – PETITIONER-IN-PERSON NO. 2 https://facebook/photo.php?fbid=718798091532975&set=a.107002192712571.15407.100002083720059&type=1&theater For Full Petition of Mohini Kamwani ...Please CLICK on d Following LINK ►►►https://facebook/groups/mohini.kamwani/796098837121428/https://facebook/groups/mohini.kamwani/796098837121428/ Or Please CLICK on d Following LINK ►►►https://dropbox/s/k5ojw1utszo8dx5/HC%20Case%20-%20Crim%20WP%20-%20Hardas%20%26%20Bhatkar.docx?dl=0
Posted on: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:36:21 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015