A week after United States Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, and three other brave Americans, were murdered by Muslim terrorists in 2012, on Sept 19, 2012, Jay Carney, on behalf of the President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, issued a statement that “We [specifically President Obama] are aware that a French magazine published cartoons featuring a figure resembling the prophet Muhammad, and obviously we [especially President Obama] have questions about the judgment of publishing something like this. We know that these images will be deeply offensive to many and have the potential to be inflammatory. But weve spoken repeatedly about the importance of upholding the freedom of expression that is enshrined in our Constitution. Press Secretary Carney went on to say that the White House didnt question the magazines right to publish the cartoons, but the judgment behind the decision to publish it. In essence, President Obama publicly accused Charlie Hebdos publishers of bad judgment, and, hence, instead of condemning those who might act on their umbrage, gave a green-light for last weeks Islamic terrorists to go on a rampage and murder anybody and everybody they could. It wasnt a casual West Wing blunder that kept Obama from flying to the anti-terror demonstration in Paris. Obama simply didnt want to memorialize the Hebdo cartoonists who, he feels, had slandered the one whom Obama calls The Prophet Muhammad rather than just Muhammad. The real problem was that Charlie Hebdos cartoonists hadnt gotten the memo that they had unwittingly violated Obamas executive-order anti-Muslim speech-crime against publishing something that is deeply offensive to many [Muslims] and [might] have the potential to be inflammatory [to many Muslims]. CBS release of the 2012 Carney/Obama/Hebdo story now shows just how disconnected CBC News is from the real world. CBS News re-released the 2012 archived story not to put Obama in a bad light, but because CBS thought that it showed everyone how wise the president was for warning us that Muslim terrorists were going to take revenge on Hebdos editorial staff because of its cartoons.What it did, though, was show how Obama had laid the very intellectual predicate and foundation for the last weeks Islamist murderers to make good on their threats. Imagine if an artist took a statue of Jesus on a crucifix and immersed it in a clear plexiglass vat of the artists own urine, and the Federal Government helped pay for the artist through the National Endowment of Arts and to add insult to injury, this defamation was exhibited in an American museum. Well, you dont have to imagine it, because the Piss Christ art story actually happened in 2012, and when it came tothat slander against a religion, Obama was totally silent. To Obama, Piss Christ is art deserving absolute 1st Amendment protection and its offensiveness can be ignored. Any Christian terrorists who harmed an American Ambassador because of Piss Christ would have been labeled Christian terrorists, just like Muslim terrorists should be labeled Muslim terrorists. But, outside the United States, Obama only shows understanding for Islamic terrorists to commit murder and mayhem because Obama believes it is reasonable that they get upset when someone writes or draws something deeply offensive to many and that has the potential to be inflammatory. Obama wasnt upholding free speech, he was eliminating it. The job of the President of the United States is to protect free speech, not question and derogate the speakers judgment. As to the disconnected point of CBS release of the 2012 Obama/Hebdo story, do you really have to be smart to know that if you publicly challenge Islam, Islamists will come and try to murder you? Werent Salman Rushdie’s translators and publishers murdered because of the 1989 Iranian governments fatwa by the Ayatollah Khomeini to murder Rushdie for his publishing of The Satanic Verses? Wasnt Theodore Van Gogh murdered in 2004 because he produced Ayaan Hirsi Alis short film Submission which criticized the treatment of women in Islam? It isnt that Obama predicted Hebdos massacre, its that Obama rationalizes the Islamists barbaric terrorist behavior. What Jay Carney, on behalf of the Leader of the Free World, did by attacking Hebdo in 2012 was to imply that with respect to supposedly protected first amendment free speech that involves Muslims, the prophet Muhammad, insulting Islamic terror, or even Islam itself, any anti-Islam comment is like yelling fire in a crowded theater where people can get killed running for the exits. So, even though Obama claimed he was upholding freedom of expression, Obama actually said that its not good judgment to exercise freedom of expression when it comes to statements against Islam, or against the terrorists that directly base their terrorism on Islam. Obama wasnt upholding free speech, he was eliminating it. The job of the President of the United States is to protect free speech, not question and derogate the speakers judgment. In short, seemingly by executive-order, Obama deleted First Amendment free speech when exercised to criticize Muslims, turning anti-Muslim speech into a Muslim-self-enforced speech-crime. Obama defines this as speech that is deeply offensive to many [Muslims] and has the potential to be inflammatory [to Muslims], meaning that you must avoid it because the Muslim enforcers will get violent, execute judgment and murder you - and the United States wont protect you.
Posted on: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 03:16:40 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015