ACRU Prescott: Vote NO! on Prop 426: In 1980 Arizona adopted its own version of California’s Prop 13 to limit government spending. But, some time later, Prescott set up its own local home rule option to allow the city to avoid the State limit and spend tax dollars as it wished, and, then, became one of the few cities in Arizona that imposes a sales tax on FOOD. Now, in the upcoming City election, Prescott voters have a golden opportunity to vote NO on Prop 426 (Extension of Alternate Expenditure Limitation) and, thereby, force our local politicians to shrink a bloated budget, establish priorities, eliminate “nice” but unnecessary expenses and, finally, live within a limited budget WITHOUT A FOOD TAX. VOTE NO ON PROP 426. Arizona Constitutional Rights Union by/ Ed Kahn LCDR-JAG USNR Ret. Executive Director ACRU Prescott: Vote NO! on Prop 426: In 1980 Arizona adopted its own version of California’s Prop 13 to limit government spending. But, some time later, Prescott set up its own local home rule option to allow the city to avoid the State limit and spend tax dollars as it wished, and, then, became one of the few cities in Arizona that imposes a sales tax on FOOD. Now, in the upcoming City election, Prescott voters have a golden opportunity to vote NO on Prop 426 (Extension of Alternate Expenditure Limitation) and, thereby, force our local politicians to shrink a bloated budget, establish priorities, eliminate “nice” but unnecessary expenses and, finally, live within a limited budget WITHOUT A FOOD TAX. VOTE NO ON PROP 426. Arizona Constitutional Rights Union by/ Ed Kahn LCDR-JAG USNR Ret. Executive Director ACRU Prescott: Vote NO! on Prop 426: In 1980 Arizona adopted its own version of California’s Prop 13 to limit government spending. But, some time later, Prescott set up its own local home rule option to allow the city to avoid the State limit and spend tax dollars as it wished, and, then, became one of the few cities in Arizona that imposes a sales tax on FOOD. Now, in the upcoming City election, Prescott voters have a golden opportunity to vote NO on Prop 426 (Extension of Alternate Expenditure Limitation) and, thereby, force our local politicians to shrink a bloated budget, establish priorities, eliminate “nice” but unnecessary expenses and, finally, live within a limited budget WITHOUT A FOOD TAX. VOTE NO ON PROP 426. Arizona Constitutional Rights Union by/ Ed Kahn LCDR-JAG USNR Ret. Executive Director ACRU Prescott: Vote NO! on Prop 426: In 1980 Arizona adopted its own version of California’s Prop 13 to limit government spending. But, some time later, Prescott set up its own local home rule option to allow the city to avoid the State limit and spend tax dollars as it wished, and, then, became one of the few cities in Arizona that imposes a sales tax on FOOD. Now, in the upcoming City election, Prescott voters have a golden opportunity to vote NO on Prop 426 (Extension of Alternate Expenditure Limitation) and, thereby, force our local politicians to shrink a bloated budget, establish priorities, eliminate “nice” but unnecessary expenses and, finally, live within a limited budget WITHOUT A FOOD TAX. VOTE NO ON PROP 426. Arizona Constitutional Rights Union by/ Ed Kahn LCDR-JAG USNR Ret. Executive Director
Posted on: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 00:35:10 +0000