ADDISON SAYS THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PINK SHEET BEFORE THE WITNESS IS 179 AND NONE OF THEM HAS BEEN SIGNED. HE SUGGESTS THAT THE LIST OF UNSIGNED PINK SHEET IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE LIST OF 905 PINK SHEETS THAT THE EC ADMITTED HAD NOT BEEN SIGNED. AFARI GYAN SAYS HE WOULD HAVE TO CHECK BEFORE MAKING AN ADMISSION. ADDISON PRODUCES ANOTHER SET OF PINK SHEETS. HE SAYS THE PETITIONERS WOULD LIKE TO TENDER THE LIST TO AFARI GYAN. HE ASKS WITNESS TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE PINK SHEET. QUARSHI- IDUN SAYS THE NEW LIST NUMBERING SEVEN DO NOT TALLY WITH THE CONTENT OF THE KPMG REPORT AND THEY HAVE DULY ALERTED A MEMBER OF THE PETITIONERS’ COUNSEL AKOTO AMPAW. LITHUR SAYS ASKING QUESTIONS ON THESE SET OF PINK SHEET COULD BE HIGHLY PREJUDICIAL. TSIKATA IS UP. HE SAYS THEY HAVE NO IDEA WHEN THESE PINK SHEETS WERE GENERATED. HE SAYS THEY HAVE EVIDENCE THAT ADDITIONAL PINK SHEETS WERE INTRODUCED, AN EVIDENCE WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN CHALLENGED. HE SAYS THEY CANNOT HAVE A SITUATION WHERE NEWLY GENERATED PINK SHEETS WILL BE ADDED. ONE OF THE JUDGES SAYS IT IS THE POLLING STATION THAT MATTERS AND NOT THE EXHIBIT NUMBERS. SO THAT, IF THE POLLING STATION CAN CLEARLY BE IDENTIFIED BUT HAS EXHIBIT NUMBERS MIXED UP IT MAY WELL BE ACCEPTED. TSIKATA RESPECTFULLY DISAGREES. TSIKATA CONTINUED AND SAY IT DOES NOT LIE WITH ANYBODY, NOT EVEN THE JUDGES, TO RECONSTRUCT THE CASE OF THE PETITIONERS. HE SAYS THE PETITIONERS HAVE CATEGORIZED THEIR ALLEGATIONS INTO 24 BUT IT APPEARS A NEW CATEGORY HAS BEEN INTRODUCED. HE SAYS THE PINK SHEETS NOW LABELED AS MBG WHICH THE PETITIONERS ARE THREATENING TO CROSS EXAMINE THE WITNESS ON IS FOUND IN THE KPMG REPORT AS MBF AND THAT IS UNACCEPTABLE. WE CANNOT AS WE SPEAK HAVE THE PETITIONERS SEEK TO RELABEL.
Posted on: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 12:10:03 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015