AND THE GRAMMY FOR CYNICAL POLITICS GOES TO… Americans are mostly unhappy with President Obama’s much-belabored plan to offer temporary amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants. But he is plowing ahead tonight anyway. The president’s strategy for unveiling his executive orders is getting much praise from supporters, particularly because it will “coincide with the Latin Grammy Awards on Univision, which will cut away to air the presidents address, thus guaranteeing excellent ratings among the Spanish language audience.” Obama also teased the speech in conjunction with one of his corporate backers, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, by using Zuckerberg’s site and then celebrating each other’s posts. It may sound more like a way to launch a new flavor of potato chips or a Nickleback single than a major shift in public policy. But by handpicking media partners who support the action, Obama can guarantee favorable coverage for target audiences and dial back some of the consequences with the nation as a whole. [Watch Fox: President Obama delivers an address on immigration at 8pm ET. Stay with Fox News for full coverage and analysis.] Same old song - After a relatively poor showing this fall among Latino voters in key races, Democrats are keen to show vigorous action on immigration. So, narrow-casting his remarks to the Latin Grammy audience and then heading to Nevada for a campaign rally Friday is a logical step. It’s also exactly how Obama has dealt with prior problems: Give a speech and then hit the road to complain about “Washington.” And while Democrats surely hope for Republicans to catch impeachment fever or at least offer the chance to force a government shutdown, there is little reason to believe this gambit will work any better than his previous talk treks. Remember how Democrats tried to rally black voters ahead of the midterm vote with targeted, often incendiary, outreach through African-American media outlets and direct mail. This is the same approach on a larger, risker, scale. After all, word will certainly get out. “If President Obama acts in defiance of the people and imposes his will on the country, Congress will act. We’re considering a variety of options. But make no mistake. When the newly elected representatives of the people take their seats, they will act.” – Senate Majority Leader-elect Mitch McConnell, in a Senate floor speech today. One mouth, two sides - The message the president would like the audience for the Latin Grammys to take away is that this is a big deal and that he is audacious and decisive. The message for the rest of the country is that this is no big deal, and just like what previous presidents of both parties have done to deal with a “broken” immigration system. Despite lots of evidence to the contrary, there will be a strong effort by the president to downplay these actions as temporary, necessary and normal. But with the results of the Nov. 4 elections still fresh on Americans’ minds, it will be hard for them to see this as anything but vindictive and obstinate behavior by a president who can’t deal with his new political reality. [The Federalist’s Gabriel Malor truth squads claims that Obama’s executive action on immigration is comparable to those of Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush: “They were trying to implement a complicated amnesty that Congress had already passed … Obama is clearly contravening both ordinary practice and the wishes of Congress—as expressed in statute—by declaring an amnesty himself.] What’s in the plan, man? - The White House has not released the official details of President Obama’s executive action, but there have been lots of breadcrumbs from the White House. Fox News first reported the contours of the plan to grant temporary amnesty to an estimated 5 million illegal immigrants. Since then, a steady flow of reports have offered clues to what Obama will declare: • Temporary amnesty for an estimated 4 million illegal immigrants who are parents of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents • Eliminating the age limit on the temporary amnesty Obama issued in 2012 for those who came to the U.S. as minors. The initial action applied to an estimated 1.2 million illegals under the age of 31, but only about half have taken advantage. • The administration claims that none of the recipients of the temporary amnesty will be eligible for government health coverage. • Elimination of Secure Communities, a law-enforcement program that checks the fingerprints of all inmates with the Department of Homeland Security to verify their immigration status. The plan will reportedly offer a replacement system. • Adding an unknown number of additional H1-B visas for high-tech workers, something long sought by the president’s business backers. • Unspecified additional border security measures to reduce border crossings by undocumented immigrants will be part of the president’s plan, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson told reporters this week. [Teepees - Buzzfeed got a glimpse at the White House’s immigration talking points sent out to Democratic congressional offices.] Governors ready suits - NYT: “Gov. Rick Perry of Texas accused the president of “sticking his finger into the eye of the American people” after an election that gave Republicans control over both houses of Congress. Several governors threatened legal action to block the measure. “I would go to the courts,” said Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin. “This is illegal.” Mr. Perry called a lawsuit against the Obama administration “a very real possibility.”… A number of those likely to run for president simply avoided offering direct or firm answers. … As he has in the past, [RGA Chairman] Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey refused to specify a plan for dealing with illegal immigration, saying he would not articulate a plan until he had decided whether to run for president.” But before we pivot to birth control… - NYT: “…after about 28 minutes of questions about it on Wednesday from Chuck Todd, the moderator of NBC’s ‘Meet The Press,’ Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana tried to cut off the discussion. ‘We have an hour,’ Mr. Jindal said. ‘We’ve now spent 30 minutes talking about the president breaking the law.’ The crowd here at the annual meeting of the Republican Governors Association erupted in applause.” [Ed. note: What prompted Christie’s team at the RGA to tap Todd to moderate a panel among Republican politicians?] Haslam on the inside track for new RGA chairman - Zeke Miller reports: “According to multiple individuals familiar with the gubernatorial discussions, Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam, who was reelected this month, is the inside favorite for the post, though one governor described the situation as ‘very fluid’ before governors meet to elect the new RGA leadership on Thursday afternoon.” Boehner readies plans to strike back at ‘Emperor Obama’ - Roll Call: “With the White House appearing near to announcing a broad executive amnesty in the coming days, a spokesman for Speaker John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, warned of blowback. “If ‘Emperor Obama’ ignores the American people and announces an amnesty plan that he himself has said over and over again exceeds his Constitutional authority, he will cement his legacy of lawlessness and ruin the chances for Congressional action on this issue — and many others,” said Boehner spokesman Michael Steel.” [Boehner adviser Matt Wolking lists 22 instances in which Obama claimed to lack the lacks the power to act unilaterally.] Rand: So sue him - The Hill: “Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Wednesday night that the House should pass a resolution opposing President Obama’s immigration executive action, setting up a lawsuit against him. ’What I would recommend to the House is they should immediately pass a resolution saying that what he is doing is contrary to the will of the House of Representatives,’ Paul said on Fox News. ‘That would set up, I think, a very clear-cut case in the court.’ … Paul, a likely presidential candidate, has a strategy that differs from another possible 2016 hopeful, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas). Cruzs plan calls for blocking Obamas nominees in the Senate until he reverses course, as well as including language blocking the actions in spending bills.” [Restraining order - National Review’s Andrew McCarthy argues that while there is precedent for the courts stopping presidents from doing things by fiat, there is little prior basis for the Supreme Court compelling the president to fully discharge his authority.] “If he goes forward unilaterally defying the Congress elected by the people, defying the American voters, then it’s incumbent on Republicans in Congress to use every single constitutional tool we have to defend the rule of law, to reign in a president so the president does not become an unaccountable monarch imposing his own policies in defiance of the American people. This is a moment of testing.” – Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on “The Kelly File.” Watch here. The Judge’s Ruling: Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano writes that President Obama is playing with fire: “The Framers required that every president swear to do his job “faithfully” to serve as a reminder to him that his job requires fidelity to the enforcement of laws with which he may disagree. The American people, Congress and the courts need to know we have a president who will enforce the laws, whether he agrees with them in his heart or not. Without presidential fidelity to the rule of law, we have a king, not a president.” Coburn warns of dangerous example - USA Today: “Sen. Tom Coburn, (R-Okla.), warns there could be not only a political firestorm but acts of civil disobedience and even violence in reaction to President Obamas executive order on immigration Thursday. ‘The countrys going to go nuts, because theyre going to see it as a move outside the authority of the president, and its going to be a very serious situation,’ Coburn said on Capital Download. ‘Youre going to see — hopefully not — but you could see instances of anarchy. ... You could see violence.’… ‘Heres how people think: Well, if the law doesnt apply to the president ... then why should it apply to me?’” ‘And she’ll take what you give her, as long as it’s free…’ - The Hill: “Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) opted to appear at a star-studded event honoring Billy Joel rather than meet with President Obama on Wednesday night to discuss his plans for executive action on immigration.”
Posted on: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 23:17:50 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015