ATTENTION PERSONAL INJURY ATTORNEYS: Over the years, I had the pleasure on sitting in on trials to assist my clients in cross examining OTHER Self-Proclaimed Security Experts (personal injury, negligent security, premises liability, etc.). There are THREE (3) areas where Other Self-Proclaimed Security Experts Fail to recognize when providing their testimony that can be an Advantage to YOU & Damaging to Opposing counsel: 1) Safety & Security is NOT a Science. Safety & Security Assessments/Examinations are Pro-Active Strategies to contribute in ways to deter and/or reduce the Probability of an event (potential crime). 2) Strategies VS Theories?? A Theory in Safety & Security is an Unreasonable/Unrealistic across the board Standard of care that CAN NOT be applied to ALL Safety & Security Professions. Strategies CAN BE APPLIED in a Reasonable & Realistic way in ALL Safety & Security professions. 3) Self-Policing VS Public Policing? One is a Discretionary Security Measure, the other is a Standard of Care Consult with "THE WORST" Criminologist (Safety-Security Expert & Fraud Examiner) in the Country! MEET RON WORST!! FraudAndSecurityExperts/Ron_Worst_CV.pdf RonWorstCriminologist.wordpress YouTube/user/CriminologistRWorst
Posted on: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:05:10 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015