Abu Iyaad, The British Barmaki, states: ...the attempted defence by the Fanatical Hajurites for al-Hajuri through this line of reasoning (that because the Saudi Shaykhs met with him, it implies praise and acceptance of him) is false - because the difference is that the Saudi Shaykhs do not know from al-Hajuri what they believe to be bidah and dalaalah... Unfortunately once again another contradiction from Abu Iyaad Amjad Rafeeq, which demonstrates that the matter to Abu Iyaad is to merely make foul attempts to overthrow his opponents by propagating inconsistent and inaccurate information via the media , however the matter is as Allah has mentioned in his Noble Book: وَلَوْ كَانَ مِنْ عِنْد غَيْر اللَّه لَوَجَدُوا فِيهِ اِخْتِلَافًا كَثِيرًا If it was from other than Allah you will find many contradiction therein Now to one of the Contradictions: Abu Iyaad, The British Barmaki states the following statement on the same website which he mentioned the above statement: Yahya al-Hajuri has mistakes in Tawhid, aqidah, evil statements and positions regarding the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam), towards the Companions, towards the Caliph Uthmaan (radiallaahu anhu), and towards the Scholars of Sunnah and Salafiyyah. His tongue is foul and evil and is known to lie and deceive. He and his statements have been refuted collectively by Shaykh Salih al-Fawzan... So here as the readers can see for themselves that Abu Iyaad is alleging to the public that Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan has refuted Shaykh Yahya al-Hajooree yet on the other hand he is alleging now that the Saudi Shaykhs such as ash-Shaykh Saalh al-Fawzan who has met ash-Shaykh Yahya in his recent visit to Saudi is unaware of Shaykh Yahyas bida and dalaalah , very strange indeed, so I ask Oh British Barmaki how can Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan refute a person while he is unaware of his errors and mistakes??? Likewise Abu Iyaad, The British Barmaki acknowledges the following false allegation via twitter: Shaykh Saalih al-Luhaydaan: Abandon him [Yahya al-Hajoori] While at the same time Abu Iyaad alleges that the Saudi Shaykhs such as ash-Shaykh Saalh al-Luhaydaan who has met ash-Shaykh Yahya in his recent visit to Saudi is unaware of Shaykh Yahyas so-called errors and mistakes !, again another contradiction from Abu Iyaad and Allahs aid is sought. As for what Abu Iyaad posted of the accusation of Muhammad bin Haade against ash-Shaykh Yahya then that has been clarified and responded to on the thread below: aloloomenglish.net/vb/showthread.php?1842-A-letter-from-Shaykh-Adnaan-to-Mohammed-Bin-Haadee Also Abu Iyaad quotes a statement of an individual who states in his article when he was describing the people of Damaaj: One of us became such that he would not listen to anyone but Shaykh Yahyaa and his students. Which is a blatant lie, as all know that in Damaaj there was a variety of tapes, fataawa, books, and lessons of the Salafi shuyookh of Saudi , Yemen and Egypt which were being benefited from by the people of Damaaj. Such lies which Abu Iyaad is currently spreading will only increase the public in certainty that Shaykh Yahya and his students have been oppressed by the fanatics of Ubayd al-Jaabiree. و الله الموعد
Posted on: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 21:26:27 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015