All of you probably know about the celebrated 2012 judgment of the Supreme Court in Bharat Aluminium v. Kaiser Aluminium, which changed the law on the jurisdiction of Indian courts over foreign-seated arbitrations. What about arbitration agreements that indicated a foreign seat but were entered into before the Bharat Aluminium decision? Here, Sindhu Sivakumar points out how the Supreme Court blew a chance to underline that a foreign seat was sufficient to exclude the jurisdiction of Indian courts. #internationalarbitration
Posted on: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 04:45:54 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015