And I quote: arXiv:1110.5642v1 [hep-ph] 25 Oct 2011 Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION CCTP-2011-35 Mini-Black-Hole production at RHIC and LHC. Elias Kiritsisa,b, Anastasios Taliotisa aCrete Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece bAPC, Universit´ e Paris 7, Bˆ atiment Condorcet, F-75205, Paris Cedex 13, France (UMR du CNRS 7164). Abstract: We argue that heavy-ion collisions provide the best testing ground for mini- black hole physics as MP≃ 4GeV for the gravity dual of YM and give concrete evidence for a new extra dimension, that is visible only to the strong interactions. We analyse the process of production evolution and decay of the mini-black-holes by using recent results on gravity duals of YM. There are several novelties compared with the traditional story of black hole evaporation, including Bjorken scaling instead of sphericity, evaporation via bubble nucleation instead of the Hawking mechanism and lepton-poor final states. Multiplicities are estimated using shock-wave scattering techniques. It is argued that high- multiplicity/high energy pp collisions will also show similar characteristics of mini-black- hole production and decay. Keywords: Gauge-gravity correspondence, Tachyon Condensation, QCD Anomaly, Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking. Based on talks given at the Planck 2011 conference in Lisboa, Portugal and the EPS conference in Grenoble, France, July 2011. To appear in the proceedings of the EPS conference. Page 2 Contents 1. Introduction1 2.The static, translationally-invariant black holes of IHQCD 3 3.Black holes in heavy-ion collisions5 4. Entropy production and particle multiplicities 4.1 Shocks without transverse dependence 7 7 5.Outlook8 6. Acknowledgements9 1. Introduction The subject of the EPS talk was a review of holographic model of four dimensional YMs, [1], its implications for the finite temperature structure of the theory, [2], and its predictions for the calculation of transport coefficients [3] and the Langevin diffusion of heavy quarks in the quark-gluon plasma, [4]. A review of the model can be found in [5]. What we would like to do here, is to explore the physics of the heavy-ion collisions in the dual gravitational description and argue that this process can be described in the dual gravitational description as the collision of two energy lumps that form a trapped surface that eventually leads to a horizon formation, and ensuing thermalization. The mini-black hole thus produced is unstable and it evolves classically until it decays via evaporation to a large multiplicity of final states. Such a picture was explored in the context of an AdS theory with a hard IR cutoff by a number of authors, [6, 7]. Since then, the structure of the bulk theory is better understood, and we will analyze the process in view of the new developments. Black holes have dominated the mysteries associated with gravity over the past decades. It therefore seemed like a golden opportunity when a production of mini-black-holes seemed credible, [8, 9] at energies not far from the TeV region, if gravity had a lower characteristic scale. This provided hope that the mysteries of black-holes, namely their thermodynamics behavior, their entropy of extreme size, the Hawking radiation and the ensuing informa- tion paradox, could be studied at colliders. Experimenters could provide an experimental scrutiny that looks more promising that expecting indirect signals from astrophysical black holes that are “stars” these days of galaxy-core gravitational phenomena. Theories of large extra dimensions are still candidates for reality, however current ex- perimental constrains make the size of a higher-dimensional Planck scale recede further – 1 – Page 3 from the currently accessible energy range, making the possibility of mini-black hole pro- duction look rather remote. Despite this unfortunate state of affairs, the gauge theory/string theory correspondence provided an alternative arena for mini-black hole production. QCD, the gauge theory of strong interactions is expected at large Nc to be described by a string theory. This theory seems elusive, as the string is very soft at high energies, but the expectation of a gravitational description at low energies is well founded, and a model that has the right properties and matches many YM observables has been proposed in [1] and [10]. We will argue further on, that the heavy-ion collisions at CERN and LHC as well as the proton-proton collisions at LHC with high-multiplicity final states can be described by the formation and evaporation of a mini-black-hole, possible as the 5-dimensional Planck scale has been determined to be MP≃ 4 GeV, [11]. Moreover, the gravitational theory has a single extra dimension, [1], that is indirectly visible via the gravitational physics. This dimension may be expected to be a bit ”fuzzy” as the the number of colors of the strong interactions Nc= 3 seems far from the large-Nc limit. However, as lattice simulations suggest (see figure 1 and [12]), SU(3) YM seems very close to SU(∞) YM. It is therefore fair to say that most of the quantum gravitational effects, controlled by 1/N2 care small. The process of black hole formation and evaporation in the dual theory of QCD has similarities with expectations for standard asymptotically flat black-hole production in gravity, like 1. large total cross section, 2. very large multiplicity events, but with few hard final particles 3. suppression of hard perturbative scattering processes, 4. Democratic primary decay (but only in the strong interactions). However, the process of black hole formation and evaporation in the dual theory of QCD differs in several respects from the processes that many authors advocated for LHC, namely 1. The gravity in question is not the standard gravity, but the one of QCD, where the gravity is mediated by the 2++glueball. Other fields, and most importantly the “dilaton” (0++glueball) play also an important role. 2. Instead of high sphericity events, there is approximate Bjorken boost invariance in the metric. 3. They are BHs in asymptotically AdS space (almost) instead of asymptotically flat space. 4. Their primary decay is not via Hawking radiation but via bubble nucleation. 5. The ratio of hadrons to leptons is small. – 2 – Page 4 Page 5 Figure 1: Left: normalized entropy as function of temperature for YM with various Nc = 3,4,5,6,8. Right: the normalized trace of the stress tensor (interaction measure). The yellow lines are based on the calculations of IHQCD. Data by M. Panero from [12]. • The large black holes have a E(T), S(T) that matches the one in large NcYM. In particular E ∼ T4, S ∼ T3as T → ∞. The horizon position is rlarge large temperatures, where r = 0 is the position of the AdS boundary. The specific heat is positive. h ∼ 1 T→ 0 at • The small black holes are unstable, with negative specific heat. They are however nowhere near Schwartzschild black holes. Although like Schwartzschild black holes they are unstable, they have scalar hair that makes them have different properties as obvious from their thermodynamic functions. As T → ∞ their horizon shrinks to zero size as rsmall h ∼ We also have T Λ2 QCD. Note that r → ∞ is the IR region of the bulk geometry. S ≃ V3 exp ? −3 T2 Λ2 QCD ? ,E ≃ V3M3 PT exp ? −3 T2 Λ2 QCD ? ,T → ∞(2.4) It is interesting that at large T, the small and large black holes satisfy the duality relation (ΛQCDrsmall h )(ΛQCDrlarge h ) ≃ 1 (2.5) which should be compared with the analogous relation in global AdS, (ℓ rsmall Using as parameter rh, we can put both the large and small branches on the same diagram. For rh < rmin we are in the large bh branch while for rh > rmin we are in the small bh branch. The two branches merge at rminat a common temperature Tmin. The functions E(rh),S(rh) are monotonic (decreasing) functions of rh. As functions of temperature, in each branch, E(T),S(T) are monotonically increasing functions. They also satisfy, [2] Elarge(Ti) > Esmall(Tj) , h )(ℓ rlarge h ) ≃ 1. Slarge(Ti) > Ssmall(Tj) (2.6) for any Ti,Tj. – 4 –
Posted on: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 02:49:41 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015