And so, wow. nice. I’m having a break when I saw your post - TopicsExpress



          

And so, wow. nice. I’m having a break when I saw your post while letting the medical knowledge sink in. trying to get myself awake. You know the usual internet hoolaballo. then I opened this page. And lo and behold, there you are, like sending a bat-signal getting batsy’s attention. I thought you won’t be posting coz some douche’s craving for attention. ROFL. Think his bait would catch me? Lol, kid. I’m far ahead of the curve. Well, gee... thanks for the appreciation. I can sound civilized too. It depends on the crowd. ROFL. To get back 1. About my definition of Prayle. Like what I have explained in my previous post, to me prayle is a term for a corrupt priest. Like Damaso. So in my terms, Prayle and damaso are synonymous and they mean the same thing. Actually, for me my definition of judgment is more of like an evaluation of results based on data, facts and results. Like the scientific process or the law of evidence. So it is different from prejudice and discrimination. 2. Ok, about the institution. As you said that: “in fact they are a religious institution that puts up a Catholic school.” It doesn’t mean if that they are religious they are not corruptible. They just know how to hide it better. They’re the ones in control. And every institution has its own ability to protect their employees, if that institution benefits from him/her. Like I said these institutions just know how to cover “these” things. If it didn’t leak out, it didn’t happen. To cut short, not just here in the Philippines but in the whole world as well, corruption happens in these kinds of institutions. To site an example, the statement said by pope francis that he admitted that there are thousands of army of pedophile prayles. Not just prayles but cardinals as well. You can google it. 3. Youre correct. This world is never fair. It will never be. Only those with power emerge victorious. And those who are weak, oppressed. But I don’t know… things and times are changing. 4. Bout that blind thingy. But didn’t attack me personally by calling me blind? That’s an attack on physical defect. I called them prayle because of what they DO not on how they look. And when you said: “I don’t generalize people. Because I know that’s where equality starts”. Then when you called me “Bulag ka”. “Judgemental ka”. “Manhid ka”. “Feeler ka”. “OA ka”. “Bastos ka”. Didn’t you just generalize? Or oh yeah... an ad hominem. 5. And to my reply with this: “generalizing every priest in this country with a negative connotation” I was trying to back read but I can’t seem to find my previous post. Did the admin delete it? Let’s just say that I did generalize. When I thought of what that was my mindset in not just of in here but all over the world. Universal generalization. Yup. Generalization. But my point is not every institution that represents religion is not corruptible. No matter how long they are established dirt are still on their faces. 6.I didn’t lecture about respect. That wasn’t a lecture. It’s just a phrase for god’s sake. And how can I lost something if I havnt earned anything yet? 7. About the tabula rasa, well I guess im gonna go with Socrates that when you empty your mind and know that you know nothing that’s when the time you get the true wisdom. My point, I still have a lot to learn. PS. Hope you suit won’t get busted battling Thanos. And you know what? That’s my secret. I’m always ready. by Crisostomo Ibarra 2016 MD VALENZUELA CAMPUS 100%: Nagtagumpay ka.
Posted on: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 18:08:34 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015