Anthony Graydon Kitchen :- A personal view. Nationality is an - TopicsExpress



          

Anthony Graydon Kitchen :- A personal view. Nationality is an accumulation of the historic development of groups of people who established defendable boundaries for mutual protection and support. Boundaries are not only physical they are also abstract ideas represented by laws for governance and individual behaviour acceptable within a community. Establishing moral standards and much more came into being by trial and error. There is the protection of children, the family and the rights of ownership. Within these societies people accept and understand these norms. Such boundaries came into being to protect people and stabilise interactions between them in close-knit societies. This way of life takes several thousand years in its development and forms a nations sociological makeup and is a continually evolving process. This history is the inherent code for the way our lives are conducted that few people recognise or understand. It was this long road that built our character and individualised us with the British way of life. Stable wealthy Western societies are under attack on two fronts, from within their own ranks and from people migration. The world, overpopulated, is causing an invasion of the wealthy nations of Europe and American continents via migration. Ethnic minorities cannot take possession of a culture and destroy its historic institutions or beliefs by force. Christian immigrants are relatively benign, coming from countries that have fundamentally the same moral concepts upon which their laws are based, Christian heritage. Their main concern is to improve their standard of living, and they are able to relate to their hosts and integrate willingly. Certainly the second generation will be indistinguishable from the indigenous people, with only their names suggesting their origin. In the thinking of Christian developed nations to be other than considerate is thought to be a moral sin. It was not always so it was the evolution of thinking that removed outward national and religious aggression. This benign liberal approach is a gift to some ethnic groups, whos migration was solely for financial reasons, with no intension to fully integrate into the society of their hosts. They arrive believing they have the right, given to them by their special God (myth), to replace modern developed thinking with their ancient religious dictatorships. Western liberal thinking has reinforced their hopes, this I fear could lead to an eventual occupation and subjugation of indigenous people by stealth. Such a possible occupation is further aided by the collusion of overlay self righteous liberal minded people, who believe foolishly that their actions make them special, both in their perception of themselves and that of their peers. They are wrong on both counts. My other concern is for the progressive thinkers within these societies who do not seem to have the guts to counter and remove the radicals from their midst. The bad ones, the liberals, are like the Gnu hiding in full view while the Lions pick off the good guys around the edges because they are easy pray.
Posted on: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 09:49:12 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015