Archeologically speaking ... evidence of deeply buried man-made chambers and yielding carbon dates going back as far as 26,000 years. This was the last Ice Age when our ancestors are supposed (according to the orthodox archaeological model) to be have been nothing more than primitive hunter gatherers incapable of large-scale construction and engineering feats. Was it possible that geologist Natawidjaja was unearthing the proof of a lost advanced civilization of prehistoric antiquity? Concerning understandable skepticism from Michael Kempster- I cite my favorite philosopher of science, Damon Runyon: the race is not always to the swift, nor the contest of strength to the strong, but thats the way to bet. And Carl Sagan, pointing out that they laughed at Galileo, but also Bozo the Clown. That said, it happens from time to time that new data turn established thinking upside down, and that skepticism is in order not just with respect to Hancock/Hillmans claims, but to ones own predilections.
Posted on: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 21:05:06 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015