As a peach farmer directly benefiting from the extraordinary waste generated from the Farm Bill via insurance subsidies and the EQIP program, I can personally attest to the welfare benefits that the insurance and farm lobbies garner for themselves. Other than the corrupt leadership, most of the folks who are part of this lobby are opposed to big government welfare programs and fascist cornering of the remnant free market. Lack of understanding of the fiat based fractional reserve banking system and its connection to political influences ensures that farmers not stray from funding fold. Farmers, and society as a whole, does not understand banking and thus our desire to be fair is never materialized. If farmers, and society in general, wants to be consistent in our governing philosophy, we must recognize that extracting resources from the rest of the system destroys our own system from within. Welfare programs are harmful to farming in the same way that they are to the rest of the market: they provide monetary incentives to current practices which ensures that market innovation is suppressed and new and improved market stable practices are not adopted. Perhaps the most deleterious aspect of farm subsidies, or subsidies in general, is government smothering of natural forces, forces that encourage competition and innovation. Enormous crony profiteering that occurs through these programs wins out - just look at insurance company profits. How can we advocate an end to welfare programs like food stamps or subsidized housing programs when we are doing the same for ourselves? Consistency is key to credibility. The root of all government largesse is a banking system that allows for seemingly endless dolling out of political loot to politically connected classes that effectively buoys some at the expense of everyone else. I am as guilty as anyone of taking part of this system. In a free market system of banking, funding is naturally extended to those who create things and provide the greatest benefit to society. As long as our banking system is structured the way it is, with funding extended to those who politically extract it, the system will remain stagnant and in decline. Here is another take on the situation from Taxpayers for Common Sense: Gluttonous Farm Bill Volume XVIII No. 48: November 27, 2013 Thanksgiving is a day to pause and give thanks. Yet when it comes to agriculture, lobbyists and farm state lawmakers just can’t seem to get enough. While they should take Thanksgiving to think about just how great they have it, they’re actually bickering over who gets the next big helping of taxpayer subsidies. The agriculture sector has a lot to be thankful for. As the USDA just reported, net farm income for 2013 is set to be a record $131 billion. That’s 15% more than last year and, after adjusting for inflation, the best year since 1973. Yet the appetite of industry lobbyists and farm state lawmakers is unquenchable. Now attempts to negotiate a compromise farm bill have broken down as each individual lobby pushes for a greater piece of the taxpayer dollar pie. Covering everything from loan guarantees for biofuels facilities and grants for drinking water wells to food assistance and crop insurance, the farm bill is a nearly $1 trillion buffet of special interest dishes. And it’s a spread that routinely costs more than expected – the last two farm bills are on pace to cost $400 billion more than was estimated when they were adopted. With our nation now $17 trillion in debt and after receiving a directive to find budget savings, the agriculture committees are being forced to change their ways. But treating the bill as something other than a bird to stuff with parochial giveaways is proving hard for them to stomach. One of the richest parts of the farm bill is the federally subsidized crop insurance entitlement program. Producers of everything from almonds to oysters receive taxpayer subsidies to buy insurance, not just on their crops, but usually on the revenue they expect from those crops. It’s extremely (overly) generous, on average more than 60% of the premium is covered by taxpayers, and the program cost $14 billion last year – in a year with the best profits in more than a generation! But the agriculture committees aren’t looking to enact common sense reforms to crop insurance, but instead to expand the program and actually increase spending. For the last two years they’ve attempted to add every dish they can onto the crop insurance gravy train. The centerpiece turkey is taken care of with mandates for “business interruption” insurance for poultry producers who experience losses due to slaughterhouse bankruptcies or “catastrophic events,” aka the weather. Not into poultry—you’re covered! Producers of your holiday ham could get their own insurance for disease outbreaks, there’s profit margin insurance for catfish producers, and even a directive for USDA to study policies for seafood harvesters. Yes, seafood crop insurance. One can only guess we’ll pay the difference if boatmen are looking for jumbo shrimp but only net medium ones. But it’s not just the meat getting attention. There’s a mandate to create peanut revenue insurance. The House gives priority to rice. The Senate expands this to cover all specialty crops, USDA speak for basically everything you’d recognize as a fruit or vegetable. There’s also a focus on sugar cane, sweet sorghum, and other “dedicated energy crops.” Even the tablecloth is covered, as cotton gets its own elite program added on top of crop insurance. And no worries if you leave those leftovers out too long and they begin to spoil, there’s priority consideration in developing a crop insurance policy to cover losses due to “health advisory, removal, or recall related to a contamination concern.” Taxpayers can’t afford for the agriculture committees to continue to write farm bills that, as House Agriculture Committee Chairman Lucas (R-OK) said himself, get us through bad times and make the good times better.” Reforming crop insurance so that it’s part of a cost-effective, accountable, transparent, and responsive agriculture safety net is possible. But lawmakers will have to first stop the mad scramble to load up their platters with parochial giveaways and reflect on just how great they already have it. There’s no better day to do that than Thanksgiving. posted by David Cox
Posted on: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 17:17:36 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015