Baby Boomer architects and their Modernist offspring are enraged by Prince Charles’s recommended list of architectural principles. Tim Abrahams, an architectural critic, says: “His idea about reconnecting with traditional approaches and techniques is really just a flight of whimsy from an elderly laird strolling in his tweed plus-fours around an estate.” Alister Scott, professor of environment and spatial planning at Birmingham City University, says: “The combined impact of these principles, when backed up with the examples he uses, is socially regressive and elitist. Here at B&L, we have no problem with the prince’s recommendations. In fact, we’re committed to them. The prince’s 10 points: 1: Developments must respect the land. They should not be intrusive; they should be designed to fit within the landscape they occupy. 2: Architecture is a language. We have to abide by the grammatical ground rules, otherwise dissonance and confusion abound. This is why a building code can be so valuable. 3: Scale is also key. Not only should buildings relate to human proportions, they should correspond to the scale of the other buildings and elements around them. Too many of our towns have been spoiled by casually placed, oversized buildings of little distinction that carry no civic meaning. 4: Harmony − the playing together of all parts. The look of each building should be in tune with its neighbours, which does not mean creating uniformity. Richness comes from diversity, as Nature demonstrates, but there must be coherence, which is often achieved by attention to details like the style of door cases, balconies, cornices and railings. 5: The creation of well-designed enclosures. Rather than clusters of separate houses set at jagged angles, spaces that are bounded and enclosed by buildings are not only more visually satisfying, they encourage walking and feel safer. 6: Materials also matter. In the UK, as elsewhere, we have become dependent upon bland, standardized building materials. There is much too much concrete, plastic cladding, aluminium, glass and steel employed, which lends a place no distinctive character. For buildings to look as if they belong, we need to draw on local building materials and regional traditional styles. 7: Signs, lights and utilities. They can be easily overused. We should also bury as many wires as possible and limit signage. A lesson learned from Poundbury is that it is possible to rid the street of nearly all road signs by using ‘events’ like a bend, square or tree every 60-80 metres, which cause drivers to slow down naturally. 8: The pedestrian must be at the centre of the design process. Streets must be reclaimed from the car. 9: Density. Space is at a premium, but we do not have to resort to high-rise tower blocks which alienate and isolate. I believe there are far more communal benefits from terraces and the mansion block. You only have to consider the charm and beauty of a place like Kensington and Chelsea in London to see what I mean. It is often forgotten that this borough is the most densely populated one in London. 10: Flexibility. Rigid, conventional planning and rules of road engineering render all the above instantly null and void, but I have found it is possible to build flexibility into schemes and I am pleased to say that many of the innovations we have tried out in the past 20 years are now reflected in national engineering guidance, such as The Manual For Streets.
Posted on: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:07:31 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015