Been thinking, WHAT IS IT that makes me, in this case be able to talk to others in a synchronizing manner? usually, people I can synchronize well with have abalance of high theory, deep awareness, and permanent application(in any one given issue we talk about) So every side of this triangle is backed up by the other ones. This , I guess is crucial. For some time now, I thought about WHAT TO THINK or say to the other mind, or how to be personally open, or things like that in order to get why some people are naggers all the way along and some are totally cool with you always understanding(for the sake of simplicity just believe I have been thinking about almost anything) this is nothing but a puzzle piece, but I really think it is imprortant. if you fEx never have been in an evolutionary sangha or context(how ever you named it, and:if it is not corrupted, if it is: bad for you), have been living and doing in there, your theory will be informed by that, and new modes of taking the world will be much more obvious. they are evidenced in experience, applied, understood in theory and owned and internalized into the cosmos via application if you live in a context were fEx VERTICALITY is alive on the inside of the cosmos for everyone, at least for short moments, and than come back to facebook were people tell you mental-psychological ideas about their own interpretation of sverticality the feel is quite absurd, even if they have nice twists. So, that may just be a good indicator for integrally looking at people and their ability so say sth on the issue. the fourth factor is time , the fifth friction. If you spend time in intense friction in a context allowing you to create that context into the future via also the three points written about above, you will gain INTEGRAL EXPERIENCE; means: an experience(which is knowing and doing synthesized) over time in evolutionary action, which than builds up sth you can relate to in others who have been building up sth similar somewhere this thought(the integral experience is a part of a coming integral xycs(a thing which comes after the idea of "theory" or "praxis", i couldnt find a word yet)and belongs to sth I learned in the context E-next Thus, it also doesnt matter to explain stuff in theory only. If , lets say, the capacity for honesty and passion is not well built in the other, they will not be able to resonate, because the strings are not there. If you want to go authentic, they will not give you, if you put out strong ideas and actions, their ant minds will just nag and brag. This is not them, it is false smal self, still.. if someone than is decided to stay in green, postmodern self-pity, where the other side is negativity and the wish to attack, the situation is absolutely hopeless, at least if you cant find the secret key to the dimension that wants to express itself through this other thus the point is not to find the better argument. The point is not to engage this game at all. The point is really just living an integral life. One were manipulation and delusion via those who feel hurt and want to tear others down with them into the hell of the narcissist falls off from our shoulders like leaves at the end of autumn thus: goodbye and good night
Posted on: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 00:34:09 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015