Beginning to assemble another thought thread. Will probably need - TopicsExpress



          

Beginning to assemble another thought thread. Will probably need to continue tomorrow, so am just parking some things here for now. Please feel free to add if you find anything pertinent. I desire to find out WHY is it so easy to find so much on the fact all the roles our DNA plays are yet unknown, especially on a quantum level, but so hard to find anyone directly connecting this fact to transgenic/gmo food? It doesnt seem like a very big leap to me. Am I missing something obvious? Also, why do they call matter dark when it could be our Creator, or the Holy Spirit, or at least something doing so much more than we fully realize? It appears that the languages we were looking for, are, in fact, hidden in the 98%, junk DNA contained in our own genetic apparatus [4]. The basic principle of these languages is similar to the language of holographic images [5] based on principles of laser radiations of the genetic structures [6] which operate together as a quasi-intelligent system, as in [3] It particularly important to realize that our genetic devices actually perform real processes which supplement the triplet model of the genetic code. This is the only site I have found so far that at least says this: (Quoted from Gene exchange no 2, 1996) In another reminder that we may not understand the full ramifications of genetic engineering, Science magazine recently reported new work on the function of genetic material*. Scientists have long been puzzled by the fact that fully 97% of the DNA in human cells does not code for proteins and appears to consist of meaningless sequences. The possibility that this apparently useless DNA has some as yet unknown function continues to tantalize scientists. The Science article reports on a paper suggesting that the non-coding 97% of the DNA, commonly referred to as junk DNA, might have a function. The authors of the paper employed linguistic tests to analyze junk DNA and discovered striking similarities to ordinary language. The scientists interpret those similarities as suggestions that there might be messages in the junk sequences, although its anyone s guess as to how the language might work. * F. Flam, Hints of a language in junk DNA, Science 266:1320, 1994. GMO poison was already being introduced into our grocery stores when this was discovered, yet 18 years later, still no ban on transgenics or proof of what it is doing to our realm on a quantum level. psrast.org/junkdna.htm
Posted on: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 02:35:14 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015