Being princely is childs play to me, honestly. Politically, supporting that as more than childs play can lead to a weakened political system. There are four types of Presidencies, as said by Richard J. Ellis who wrote The Development of the American Presidency: princely, perverted, progressive, and potent. Do I sound beholden to a book and the clout in it? Maybe I do. Maybe I am. Could I wrote a critique and attempt to challenge it? Yes I could. What for, though? What would be the reasoning for that?
Posted on: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:05:15 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015