Being the victim of negative campaigning means I am not into slamming candidates over their personal life. In certain circles, I take a bleating intense stand against Obama, the Clintons, Warren, and Sanders. The New Left, where I was pocketed by the media as labels define the body politic, bought into these liars, I never did to the consternation of my fellow lefties. My political credentials are actual not literary and stem from a politically savvy mother coupled to attending college developing into an activist advocating protection of the Earth and human rights. Later, I became a thumper for traditional Main Street family business. Why? I was one of them. In the past, I yammered on about the strata and place I grew up in - yet let me make this perfectly clear, my mother was a professional who worked her entire life until five years before her death. I plan on continuing to do my act until the day I stop breathing and watching birds. We must uncover new political leadership with overt intelligence and a rock solid set of ethics and values if the ailing western world is to wrestle itself from the stranglehold of the corporatocracy. Today, the piddle stream is clogged up with pro-Warren for POTUS crap. As a creative revolutionary, I cannot support another mouthpiece for the establishment. She is a pawn to her own ambitions. This is true to the course of politics as many I knew who sought public office have egos larger than Minnesota, and at one time I would include myself in this pond. One would think while paddling up a river of logic, the more people, the larger number of possible adept democratic leaders. So, could someone explain why the pool of possible honest representatives is a contracting universe instead of an expansive one? Money of course is the keystone as campaign finance reform is a joke worse than Tiger Woods looking for a come back.
Posted on: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:05:12 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015