Below is the two-page research vision paper I just wrote for my - TopicsExpress



          

Below is the two-page research vision paper I just wrote for my application to the PhD program at California Institute for Human Science: For the last 17 years, I have been observing the effects of the pure tones of tuning forks on the human body and mind, through a process I have come to call “sound balancing”. I have a busy private practice with this method, and have taught it to over 100 students over the last three years. From the very beginning of my using forks (I am completely self-taught), I have observed two key phenomena that are the basis of the sound balancing process: the tone produced by the forks changes as they pass around the body, revealing information about the energetic structure of both the body and the biofield; and the forks can modulate this energy and information to create beneficial therapeutic outcomes. I discovered from the outset that I had the somewhat curious ability to “hear the stories” in the changing tones of the forks, and this ability led to the observation, compiled over many years, that the biofield appears to contain a record, via information embedded in standing waves, of a person’s energetic history – a sort of personal Akashic record. This “Biofield Anatomy” as I have come to call it, appears compartmentalized, stratified and timelined, with different emotions, relationships, and “states of mind” residing in specific areas of the field. Information contained at the outer edge of the field (about 5 feet out in most people) relates to gestation, birth and earliest childhood, information close to the body is current or recent, and all other years fall in between like rings in a tree. Depending on where resistance or distortion is located, I am able to determine, with great accuracy, the age at which various traumas on the mental, physical or emotional levels occurred and the primary emotion or issue involved. I am able to work with these “pathological oscillations” by doing what appears to be a vibrational modulation of the source point of the trauma, along with a sense of “freeing up the charge associated with it and returning it to the proximal energy center along the spine” via the “click, drag and drop” method of sound balancing. Areas of trauma have “charge” that can be moved with a vibrating tuning fork, much like a magnet moving iron filings, away from the trauma back into the body, where the energy appears to be absorbed by the chakra system. This process can alleviate pain, “stuckness”, emotional over-reactivity, and a broad variety of other symptoms. The discovery and development of this process and this anatomical structure have raised many questions for me that I have yet to answer in a satisfactory manner. My Master’s Thesis, “Exploring the Effects of Audible Sound on the Body and its Biofield” was a start in this direction. In this research I began the process of asking these questions: • What is the “charge” or “resistance” I encounter when passing tuning forks through the biofield? • Could it be biophotons? • Why does this charge appear to “follow” the vibrating fork, like iron filings following a magnet? • Does the stratified, compartmentalized and timelined Biofield Anatomy exist independently of my perception? • Can the overtone changes that I identify as specific “frequency signatures” as such phenomenon as arthritis, scar tissue, fibroids, pulled muscles, and different emotions such as fear, sadness, shame, etc. be isolated, amplified and quantified by technological equipment? Are there “codes of emotion” that we can identify? • What, exactly, are the “putative” energies of the biofield? Can we create Western consensus science of the anatomy and physiology of the biofield? For my Thesis research, I attempted to visualize these changing tones with a microphone and spectrograph software program. While ultimately the study was flawed for various reasons, it was a first step in the direction of answering some of these questions. CIHS has the resources of both people and equipment for me to continue this process in a much more sophisticated manner. I have devised a number of experiments to test my hypotheses: • Conduct sound balancing sessions in the sound-proof room with a microphone array to record and listen to and analyze the complex overtones through a variety of renderings to determine if the patterns I hear with my ear can be isolated, amplified, and codified. • Observe the process with the biophoton counter to see how it affects biophotonic activity. • Utilize an “auto-resonating” tuning fork with a transducer to eliminate the artifact of fork activation in the signal. Use the signal from the transducer to create a real-time imaging system of the biofield. • Utilize above fork on a mechanical arm to determine if these frequency signatures show up objectively around the body without a practitioner present. • Collaborate with others to create a working theory on what exactly is happening in the sound balancing process. • Collaborate with others to develop a more comprehensive scientific definition of the putative energies of the biofield. I would like to see “Biofield Science” become an academic subject and perhaps even participate in the creation of a text book on the subject. In the words of Lynne McTaggart, “Informational Medicine, that changes disturbed information available in the biofield, is going to be the future of medicine.” I believe the research I can conduct at CIHS has the potential to bring us a long way in that direction.
Posted on: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:10:33 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015