Bernard Souw commented on a video on YouTube. Shared publicly - Sep 25, 2014 Your understanding of the Compton Effect is fundamentally wrong. So is also your entire explanation as to how the anti gravity effect is generated by a rotating superconducting disc, or Podkletnovs high current discharge with one superconducting electrode. Antigravity Physics Explained by Alienscientist - Podkletnov - Znidarsic 1 2 comments Bernard Souw Nov 21, 2014 Up to this day there is no established theory of anti-gravity that has been validated by the scientific community. Conclusion made after Podkletnovs experiment is too speculative. Dr. Ning Lis theory failed to materialize in experiments. Read more Gavin Curtis (to me) But the places he has been have all been confirmed. Established laws of physics are for pussys that are afraid of real science. Not the established religious textbook science that the sheep gobble up daily. Why are the people here a bunch of blue heads? Gavin Curtis (to me) Arrogant fool. Lazar exposed A51 and S4. I can put 10 of your kind and add up the IQ points. They will fit on a 2 digit counter with room to spare. Jaamman to Bernard Souw Yeah but We went to the moon bout 50 years ago..and Eisenhower warned us about the Industrial Military Complex..and We are to believe the Military has stood still for 50+ years..you shitting me! jaamman Go back to the Dark Ages and our society would be Witch Craft..are you a witch for having a car, hot water or any modern appliance? Now go hundreds of years forward..you can bet anything we have is crumbs and the government is light years ahead of anything they let the Public have, togowack to Gavin Curtis There is plenty of evidence for UFOs and he offers a great explanation for why they are observed to move the way they do, did you have a better explanation? Or you deny that over 5% of the population is abducted each year? Gavin Curtis reply to togowack You completely misunderstand my position. I know for a fact that UFOs do exist as I have seen them, closer than I would have liked. It is impossible to prove this phenomenon to anybody else until they have their own experience. The vast majority of UFOs today are man made machines that were reverse engineered. They do move as they do... clumsily when close to another gravitational body (earths surface). Almost like a leaf falling. As Mr Lazar has explained. The key to anti-gravity... togowack to Gavin Curtis ok sounds good My FINAL Reply to ALL: (1) Bob Lazar’s explanation is neither scientific nor technical: He said, gravity is a WAVE. Wrong! There is no compelling evidence nor necessity to define gravity as a wave! To this day, it is sufficient if gravity is understood as a FIELD. Only by analogy and tentative extrapolation can it be expanded to a wave. So far, gravitational wave has not been experimentally detected with sufficient certainty. If at all, its magnitude must be very VERY small. More disturbing is Bob Lazar’s repeated use of the wording “something to that effect,” which indicates he is not sure, or does not know himself, what is is! This psychological trick was also used by my students when I was Professor in Applied Physics at the New Jersey Institute of technology (1990-1995) while at the same time being a Principal Investigator in research at the Brookhaven National Laboratory (1985-1997). Bob Lazar’s further explanation does not help clarify what gravity is, and/or how the anti gravity machine works! A proper scientific or technical description should enable the listener understand, step-by-step- how it works and/or how an anti-gravity vehicle is constructed. Every step must be based on known, i.e., established, laws of physics. Bob Lazar’s use of element 160 is just another trick to obscure what he does NOT know. Even if that element exists, it would not help to construct any anti-gravity vehicle, since Bob Lazar failed to address the main problem: It is NOT the amount of energy needed, but HOW the ambient gravity may be overcome! Regarding energy, there are currently plenty of energy sources capable of delivering the required energy (which is easy to estimate), at least within a very short time, just for the sake of proof-of-principle. In short, Bob Lazar cannot deceive any good physicist with his Element-160 gimmick, which he himself does not know anything about. (2) As of late, several plausible methods have been proposed and developed to overcome gravity. One is the theoretical Gravitoelectric effect suggested by Douglas G. Torr and Ning Li [1]; the other is Podkletnov’s experiment on gravitational impulse generated by strong electric discharge through rotating superconductor disk [2]. When I first embarked on this field, I thought the scienfific world were mature enough to give birth to anti-gravity machines, especially in view of the many observations on Triangular TR3B Crafts and other types of UFOs. However, after exploring this field for a while, I became very disappointed! The theory developed by Torr & Li came out to be much too weak to fly a machine [1],[3], [6]. Moreover, the theory is based on London’s gravito-magnetic -electric equations that are presumed to resemble Maxwell equations. While Maxwell equations are rigorously based on experimental facts, there is no evidence or any experimental verification for the validity of London’s gravito-magnetic/electric equations! To validate their use, at least they must be theoretically derived! The gravitational impulse generator experiments conducted by Podkletnov [2] may be considered as an attempt to amplify the weak gravitoelectric effect generated in Torr & Li superconductor system by utilizing the large impulse of a high voltage/current discharge. Volfson’s patent (No. 6,960,975 B1) [4] makes use of Podkletnov’s invention by proposing anti gravity propulsion by means of “Inflationary Vacuum State,” (IVS), presumably a direct result from Torr & Li’s gravito-electric-electric coupling with a superconductor [1],[3],[6]. However, Volfson’s patent may be based on a misunderstanding of Podkletnov’s “Gravitational Impulse Generator” (GIG), in which the High-Voltage/Current electric discharge was misinterpreted as High-Frequency discharge. There is no evidence that high frequency electromagnetic field alone is capable of generating IVS. Podkletnov might be readily in a correct path in utilizing the strong impulse generated by a high current electric discharge (>25 kA/10-5 sec) to significantly enhance the Torr & Li’s gravitoelectric effect. In other words, Podkeltnov’s Marx generator was primarily intended to obtain a short impulse of very strong magnitude Podkletnov’s discharge is to be compared to my 10-year hands-on experience while working on my Ph.D. thesis at the University of Duesseldorf, Germany [5[. Such a huge electric discharge generates a strong shock wave impulse that can be sensed throughout the whole lab spave - even up to the neighboring room(s) - might well be wrongly interpreted by Podkletnov’s team as a propagating gravity impulse. Whatever it is, Volson’s patent won’t work [6], since High Frequency discharge alone would not generate IVS, as it does not dissipate EM energy into the (rotating) superconductor electrode, as done by Podkletnov et al. Serious theoretical work is still to be done to elucidate, how IVS is created by high current/voltage discharge via Torr & Li’s gravitoelectric - electric coupling. References: [1] D.G. Torr and N. Li, “Gravitoelectric – Electric Coupling via Superconductivity” Foundations of Physics Letters, Vol.6, No.4, 1993 [2] E. Podkletnov, “The Gravitational Impulse Generator” americanantigravity/files/articles/Podkletnov-Interview.pdf [3] E.G. Harris, Foundations of Physics Letters, Vol.12, No.2, 1999 [4] Boris Volfson’s Patent google/patents/US6960975 [5] E.-K. Souw et al., Spectroscopic Measurements of the Velocity Distribution of Neutral Particles in a Plasma in Front of a Wall, J. Plasma Physics 27, 277, 1983 [5] Prof. Park in National Geographic News (2005): news.nationalgeographic/news/2005/11/1111_051111_junk_patent.html [6] M. Tajmar and C. de Matos (2006), “Gravitomagnetic Fields in Rotating Superconductors”, arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0607/0607086.pdf
Posted on: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:09:17 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015