Cancer research is a FRAUD. The 1939 cancer act is enough proof on - TopicsExpress



          

Cancer research is a FRAUD. The 1939 cancer act is enough proof on that. Unless we wake up to it, and start getting more active they will carry on murdering you and your loved ones. And with cancer rates sky rocketing to one in two that s going to touch a lot of people. They are doing it in plain sight. The fat cats raking in the profits do not give a damn. There is a depopulation programme going on hidden in plain sight. 100 % if any of my family got cancer we know the route we would go down to cure it forever. Healthy eating, all organic, exercise, buy a water distiller, buy a masticating juicer, B17 ( apricot kernel ) many super foods and supplements. And the best one of all cannabis oil. The only reason Maujana is illegal is because its a miracle plant that cures all ills and dis-eases. The list is endless. There is an avalanche of information out there. How much more money do cancer research want ? And still all they roll out is surgery, chemo and radiotherapy which Kills you off quicker than the cancer in the first place. Cancer is a warning sign you are not looking after your body. Thats all ! ........... A FREE MARKET Cancer would not be the great problem it is now, because it could be treated early with a number of non-toxic therapies. People might finally get the point that chemotherapy is poison and only works about 2% of the time according to peer reviewed studies in prestigious journals. We want a healthcare system based on the good old basic principles of do no harm. If a therapy does no harm, leave it alone. Let it into the market and see what it can do. Prices would absolutely collapse because competition drives down prices. CONTROL OF THE MARKET BY THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONS We need very tough legislation in both Canada and the U.S.There are two principal impediments to non-toxic health breakthroughs: 1. The FDA simply prevents effective new alternative treatments from coming on the market, or tries to drive them off the market. 2. The American Medical Association controls doctors licenses so that if they do not abide by the pharmaceutical protocol (if they start using 714-X for instance) they may lose their license. This goes on in Canada too. In the U.S. the American Medical Association controls State Medical Societies, which in turn control State Medical Boards, which have the authority under the law to grant a physicians license or take it away. When FDA employees retire after theyve got their pension, two-thirds to three-quarters of them take plush jobs with thepharmaceutical companies. They may have a pension of $75,000 as well as another $100,000 from a drug company job. This is something they can all take for granted in the FDA culture if they dont rock the boat. Needless to say, their objectivity during their career with the FDA is somewhat biased. In the case of the American Medical Association (AMA) its a little bit different. The AMA puts out a number of journals including the JAMA. But the major source of income for the AMA is advertisements paid for by pharmaceutical companies in their journals. Dr. Abram Hoffer pointed out that 70% of the pages of the Journal are drug ads. Youll never find any ad for amino acids or vitamins or mineral supplements. Naturally, their objectivity is somewhat warped and if doctors begin using non-pharmaceutical drug therapies, they end up in trouble. Drug companies own the medical schools, the medical profession and the FDA.
Posted on: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 09:31:04 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015