Chua lifted 135kg for the snatch, but his 182kg total for the clean and jerk is a new national record. why but? how is the second part of the sentence a contrast to the first in this context? something is completely missing in the sentence. it would have made sense if it was Chua lifted a meagre 135kg for the snatch, but his 182kg total for the clean and jerk is a new national record. but no. thats not what CNA wrote. so… why but? and why total for the clean and jerk? you dont lift some weight for the clean and another bit of weight for the jerk and then add the two up to give a total for the clean and jerk leh… maybe my england not powderful enough. need to brush up to keep up with the england used by our journalists…
Posted on: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 14:40:35 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015