ClimateGate 3.0 breaks! It would seem the math behind the claimed 97% consensus among climate scientists is as shaky as the math used in climate science (aka UN propaganda) When the numbers are crunched, their 97.1% turns out to be less than 1%! 65 climatologists of over 12,000 actually peer reviewed and confirmed the science. If thats all it takes for the science to be settled then why lie about the 97%??? Because it sounds better to people who continue to want/need to feel guilty about something??? Independent climate blogger Brandon Shollenberger has been threatened with a lawsuit and arrest if he releases data that climate alarmists left online unencrypted showing their claim that 97.1 percent of climate scientists “endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming” is false — and a huge fabrication. So, Shollenberger has once again scooped all of the MSM “investigative” journos. And, of course, the MSM thought cartel is, once again, ignoring his latest huge breakthrough, as well as the unconscionable (and ridiculous) threats of a major university. We ran a check on Google, Yahoo, and Bing for news stories about the Shollenberger/Cook/U of Queensland dustup. Almost a total zip; only one MSM story — a blog post on May 19 at the Washington Post . Nada, nothing from the New York Times , Huffington Post, CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, PBS, and all the rest of the MSM choir that have been trumpeting Cook’s phony consensus “research” for the past year. As usual, it has remained for climate skeptic sites, with minuscule fractions of the resources available to the corporate MSM giants, to do the job of responsible reporting on this dramatic development. Especially informative (and amusing) reports and analysis of the Shollenberger/Cook story have been posted by JoNova, Steve McIntyre at ClimateAudit, and Steven Hayward at Powerline .
Posted on: Sun, 25 May 2014 19:36:15 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015