Common DNA: Taxonomy & Phylogenetics Evolutionists always insist common DNA solves this debate. In fact, according to them, there is no debate at all; we are simply uneducated about the Finch-Beak theory. Consider the following: Animal A & Animal B share an environment (Earth). They drink the same water, eat the same food, are exposed to the same toxins, are essentially part of one ecosystem. Animal A & B also share many similar anatomical features. They are both mammals, have 2 lungs, 2 kidneys, 1 liver, 1 heart, etc, etc,. These animals have lots in common! Animal A & B could have either evolved from the same animal (Evolution) or, they could have been both designed by the same creator (ID). Why does taxonomy only support Evolution, when it clearly supports both? COMMON ENVIRONMENT, COMMON DESIGN, COMMON DNA. If you want to use common DNA as evidence for evolution, it has to be ruled out as designed. We can talk about ERVs and Pseudogenes later, but I want this discussion to first focus on taxonomy itself.
Posted on: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 02:52:59 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015