Contradictions Bibles 1 User Rating: / 0 PoorBest Details Created on Wednesday, 08 August / August 2012 15:42 Published on Wednesday, 08 August / August 2012 15:42 Group: Bible Hits: 1562 Print E-mail Contradictions of the Bible The contrast and contradiction in the Bible is the greatest proof of the distorted and void. The paradox of the qualities of human thought, and can not in any way that is located in the heavenly revelation as it means lying and differences, and the Lord Almighty does not lie and do not disagree with himself. Here - Dear reader - some of the contradictions of the Gospels that exist today: (1) I have cited all of Matthew, Mark novel Jesus cursed the fig tree to have received when when in [21:18] and were in when Mark [11:12] But they occurred in a clear contradiction: Say when that Jesus cursed the fig tree [after] that has cleared the Temple and the expulsion of those who were selling and buying it and we find the opposite in the Gospel of Mark, which states that Jesus cursed the fig tree [before] that have been cleansed the Temple of those who were selling and buying in it!! The novel cleanse the temple when cited in [21:12] and cited in Mark [11:15] It is the story of one single event contradiction in her novel Matthew, Mark. ------------------------------------------ (2) While we find in the Gospel of Mark [11:12] that Jesus cursed the fig tree and the pupils whom Peter knew it dried up in the next day when they saw the tree withered we return to the city [11:20] We find the opposite in the Gospel of Matthew it tells the occurrence of all the events in [the same day], and the tree dried up in the case and that the students saw what happened and said: How the fig tree withered away in the case? Matthew. [21: 18 - 20] The Is said to this inconsistency when he inspiration from the Lord of the Worlds? ------------------------------------------ (3) According to the Gospel of Mark. [14: 32-43] that Christ was arrested from menial name (Jtsimani) According to the Gospel of Luke. [22: 29 - 47] The Christ that he was arrested from the Mount of Olives! The contrast is clear and the reality in the name of the place, who arrested him to Christ. To make sure the different geographical menial (Jtsimani) for geographic Mount of Olives see (Matthew 26: 30 passed 14:26 and 32 and U-18: 1) See also the map of Jerusalem in the days of Christ at the end of the New Testament, not to claim a prosecutor that position Jtsimani = Mount of Olives and the 3 = 1. We draw this question for Christians: If you have a holy Bibles and wrote under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit How come this contradiction? --------------------------------------------- (4 ) Wrote when in [8: 1] novel Christ healing the leper who came to Jesus, saying (Sir, if you want can make me clean). Jesus stretched out his hand and touched saying: I want Vatehr. When then wrote in [8:14] novel healing of Christ to Peter protectors of fever. But Luke wrote in osteoclast [4:38] novel healing of Christ to Peters mother first, and then wrote in [5:12] novel Christ healing the leper. And the contrast is clear: When Matthew that Jesus healed the leper before he could be healed Peters mother of a fever but when Luke that Jesus healed the leper after he had healed Peters mother has a fever! It is no secret to you dear reader that astute presentation and the delay in the history of the facts and the timing of the accident who claim to be writing inspiration is a clear contradiction. ------------------------------------------- (5) Matthew wrote in [12:17], citing the Old Testament (concerning Christ): (To be what the prophet Isaiah: Behold, my servant chosen darling whom she agrees Safad soul to it.) This phrase alone when mentioning a violation of the original phrase in the book of Isaiah [42: 1] Thus, because the words of Isaiah: ((Behold, my servant whom Oeddh Mokhtari, who walked by myself)) Think you astute reader of the words when (Behold my servant you have chosen) and the original phrase (Behold my servant) It has been changed a description of slavery Ashraf epithets creature was particularly add to the same God, and who refuses to be a slave to God? Says Professor Ahmed Abdel-Wahab, in his book Christ in the sources of Christian doctrines: If we accept the argument, that the prophecy of Isaiah mentioned when realized in Christ, it was necessary to be the first qualities that: Abdullah. When Christians agree that the first recipes that Christ Abdullah, met Christian unity. But to cite a passage says that Jesus Abdullah, and then say other paragraphs of the Gospel that is so, this obvious conflict is left to the judgment of the readers mind and conscience. ------------------------------------------- (6) According to the Gospel of Matthew in [8: 5] that Jesus healed the server first before the officer that he may be healed Peters mother of a fever. According to the Gospel of Luke in [4:38] to heal protectors Peter was before the establishment of Christs healing of the Custodian of the officer in [7: 1] The narrator healing Peters mother received when when in [8:14] and when Luke [4:38] We ask Christians: Is this not a clear contradiction in the date of the incident and timing? How is believed then that clerks Bibles writing inspired by God? The inspiring words should be safe for the contradiction and difference is not different from the news of revelation and inspiration they have and this is what we do not see in the four Gospels. ----------------------------------------- (7) came in John [18: 9] the words of Christ: (Those who have given me I have not lost one of them.) That Christ in this text did not lose anyone at all, but when due, O reader astute to John in [17:12] before this text was Christ himself says: (while I was with them in the world you keep them in your name. Who gave me Hfezthm, did not destroy them A son of perdition, but to be the book.) In the eighteenth chapter did not lose anyone in the seventeenth chapter has one obvious difference that he contradiction! ----------------------------------------- (8) came in Matthew [24: 29] marks the end of time the words of Christ (and in the case after such calamities sun will be darkened and Abiye moon and falling stars from the sky [that said] people see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven in all the pride and Jalal He will send his angels with a great views to the four winds to gather his elect from the heavens to a maximum of maximum) and then said in paragraph 34 (the right to tell you, this generation will not expire until all this) And we ask Christians: It has been this generation and many generations ago did not drop one star from the sky and did not come down in a cloud of Christ was not something which was promised Christ peace be upon him, is not that obvious lie from the maligned by the clerks of Bibles to Christ? Some Christians in this good Erajiv say not heeded. ---------------------------------------- (9) We have committed Paul terribly wrong when he said that the resurrection will be in his generation and that he and those with him will perish world in their days: Paul said in his first letter to the Corinthians [10:11]: (We who ended us late ages) This is a mistake because they are not Last generation came after them, generations and generations, says in his first letter to the Thessalonians 4: 15-17]: (We are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord). He died Paul and Matt all who were with him did the Lord comes and you do not resurrection. ---------------------------------------- (10) Peter and Christ: Came in when [16:17] that Christ rewarded Peter and gave him carte blanche, saying to him: Dear reader Quran: This is a great honor and a big advantage given him the peace of Christ to Peter, and can not be Christ had said these words without consciousness or awareness of the content. But unfortunately, and which proves the corruption of Bibles that after this text and in the same chapter, we find another text attributed to Christ, contrary to the previous text which he says Christ to Peter: ((Stay away from me, you devil you are an obstacle in my way)) when [16:23] Ive forgotten when reconciling what Euclid in sanitation and making it one of Peter as an agent of Christ solves connects how he likes, and make it in the same chapter demon and a stumbling block to Christ! ----------------------------------------- (11) wrote when in [16: 6] that Christ said to his disciples ((Beware Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and the Sadducees, they reasoned among themselves, saying: ((say this because we are what gave us bread)) knew Jesus said to them: ((O ye of little faith, how do you say yourselves no bread with us? But did you understand yet? .... How do you not understand what I meant baking my words?)) This certificate of Christ that the pupils so little faith exclamation of their lack of understanding. But this calumny clear when it has already been mentioned in the chapter and the third two tenths pupils know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven illusion of the people of Paradise Kamli faith. And that this requires the denial of Christ, because he said to the disciples in Matthew [13:10]: ((has given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven)) and said to them in [13:16]: ((Blessed are you, because your eyes insight and your ears hear)) and the odd strange Mark that in [6:52] sentenced to blind students and their hearts rude!!! Fbaldharorh FALSITY when the judge at all. ------------------------------------------- (12) When all reported in [26: 18], and Luke in [22: 8] the story of the Passover supper with the disciples, but they occurred in clear contradiction: When that when students have participated in the preparation of the dinner [26: 17] He says: But when Luke to dinner prepared by only two students and two Peter and John [22: 7]: ((Then came the day of Unleavened Bread, which had to be slaughtered when the passover. Sent Peter and John, saying, Go and U H us Easter, to eat! Vsalah: «Where do you want to equip? »he said to them:« Once you coming city, Alaqakma man carrying a pitcher of water, Valhaka him to the house, which is confined., and ye shall say unto this house: you say the teacher: Where guest room, which eat the Passover with my disciples? Verakma room in the upper layer, a large and furnished. Ottaghzan there! »they went, and found as he said to them, U H Easter As well as when Mark prepared dinner of only two pupils [14:13]. ------------------------------------------ (13) In contrast to the subject of hearing the word of God: According to the Gospel of John [5:37] Christ say to the Jews: ((and Father himself who sent me testifies to me, did not hear his voice, never ...)) But when cited in [17: 1] that Christ and with him Peter and James and John to have settled over the mountain heard towards the Father of Heaven says: ((This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased, hear ye him!)) And this statement by hearing the word of God. It says in Deuteronomy that God asked Moses to gather the children of Israel on the Mount (Horeb) to hear the voice of God speaking with Moses Vsmawa voice of the Lord [Deuteronomy 4: 10, 12] The ------------------------------------------ (14) In contrast to the subject of the vision of God: John stated in [1:18] that God has not seen a cat. This is also confirmed by John in his first letter [4:12] saying: ((no one saw God)). According to the Book of Exodus [33: 20] The word of the Lord to Moses: ((But you will not see my face, because the man who does not see me live)) However, we find that there are provisions of this contradiction and confirms the vision of God! It says in the Book of Genesis [32: 30] that Gods prophet Jacob saw God face to face, he says: ((for I have seen God face to face)) According to the Book of Exodus also [33: 11] that the Lord spoke to Moses face to face as a man speaks to his neighbor! Word in Exodus 24: 9]: ((then ascended Moses and Aaron, Nadab and Abihu and seventy of the elders of Israel, and they saw the God of Israel, and under his feet the ground as if made of sapphire blue transparent similar to the sky in purity, but God did not stretch out his hand to destroy the supervision of the children of Israel . they saw God, and ate and drank -------------------------------------------- (15) came in John [3:13] the words of Christ: ((No one has ascended to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, the Son of man which is in heaven)). This talk is wrong because all of Enoch as stated in [Composition 5:24] and Elijah the prophet as stated in [2 Kings 2:11] has ascended to heaven. ------------------------------------------- (16) described in the Gospel of Matthew 39:5 words of Christ: ((But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil., But whosoever shall smite thee on the right cheek to him the other also.)) But: According to the Gospel of John 18:22: ((When he said that struck Jesus and one of the officers was standing, saying: Is this how the response of the high priest. Jesus answered him: If I have spoken evil, bear witness to the evil and the Well, why hit me.)) Why did not Jesus turns the other cheek to the server when slapped??? Though they said that they should not interpret this text literally explanation why Jesus resisted evil and objected when slapped server??? ------------------------------------------ (17) Jesus said in Luke [19:27]: How does this text say about Christ with Bibles him that he ordered his disciples lovingly enemies [Matthew 5:44]?! ------------------------------------------- (18) reported both when in [26: 6] and Marcus in [14: 1] and Luke at 7: 36, 39] John in [12: 1.4] the story of the woman who emptied bottle of perfume on Jesus, but they are caught in the differences are clear: The first difference: a novel by Mark, that the woman emptied a bottle perfume in the house of Simon the leper in Bethany [14: 3] But the novel by Luke that it happened in the house of the Pharisee [7:36] The novel by John that it happened at the home of Mary and Martha and Lazarus [12: 1_2] The second difference: a novel by Mark, that this story took place two days before the feast of Easter [14: 1] But the novel by John that this story took place six days before the Passover, [12: 1] The third variation: a novel by Mark said the woman, after I broke the vial resented people for profligacy [14: 4] But as the novel that John, who is resented Judas Iscariot [12: 4] Fourth difference: When John the story of the woman who poured perfume bottle on the body of Christ to have occurred before Christ had entered Jerusalem and rode on the colt. But when that story when the woman who poured perfume on the vial of Christ has after Christs entry to Jerusalem on the colt and bakeries. The novel Christs entry to Jerusalem and riding the colt John mentioned in [12:12] and when mentioned in [21: 1]. There is no doubt that this contradiction obscene in the history of the story can not be a book inspired by God. And not only for Christians to lie a Alangelin Think ye discerning reader. ------------------------------------------- (19) Is the word of God or is it the floor? If we look at the initial phrase of the first chapter in the Gospel of John shows us the contradiction in his words says: ((In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God, this was in the beginning with God)) These paragraphs contradictory meaning are not consistent with the concept of the mind, the saying (and the Word was with God) is not compatible with saying ((And the Word was God)) If God appointed the word is not right to be a word with him, because Andah require the contrary because it is for something when something Khsol money when Peters no doubt that money is Peter, and this phenomenon is indisputable, how the word is God and how to be with him? Then what you want to start? Does this mean the beginning or the beginning of the word of God, which is Christ? Both void with Alchristiyon They believe that God is eternal and everlasting word with him and that God is never in the presence of Christ, it also does not make sense or meaning for Christians it is contrary to their faith. If you want to start any since time immemorial, what the meaning of what came in Genesis [1: 1]: ((In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth)) Does this mean that the heavens and the earth Ozlitan?! (20) When cited in [9:18] the story of the daughter of the President of the compound, he said: (( Here is a statement from the President of the compound that his daughter is dead, but Mark said in his novel [5:22] she was sick and did not has says: ((If one of the rulers of the synagogue ... asked him much, saying: ((my little girl on another people, would thou wert come and put your hand out to heal)) Which Mulls read this story of Matthew, Mark, do not mention him in doubt it is one, but when when the girl is dead and her father is required to revive, and when Mark, that the girl is sick and her father asked her recovery, and is a big difference between the two cases. ---------------------------------------- (21) Mark wrote in [10:35] reads: ((and submit to him James and John, sons of Zebedee, saying, Master, we want to do for us whatever we asked for. Said to them, what do you want me to do for you? They said to him: Give us to sit down and one for your right hand and the other on your left in your glory.)) But when in [20:20] says: The difference here is clear between the two versions, while the mother is progressing and ask Jesus to make one of her sons on his right and the other on his left on the novel by Matthew, we find that the boys were the ones who are progressing and requesting that alleged novel by Mark!! The story one time and one place and one. The among us (John Fenton) in his interpretation of the Gospel of Matthew: the secret to this change and says: I have the latest when some of the changes and deletions to the Gospel of Mark, and the most important thing in this, that while in the Gospel of Mark, we find that Allmiven themselves request that Jesus as Bomanma is started by asking him how long novel. ----------------------------------------- (22) John is talking about the testimony of Christ, but it is marketed newly contradictory Once mentions the words of Christ that his testimony is true and acceptable, and again mentions it invalid and unacceptable, and in both cases to be testimony to the same. John wrote in [8:14] that Jesus said: However, he had written in [5:31] that Jesus said: If we say that the interpretation of these terms can be found in which the apparent contradiction that is all of them are spoken for a special reason. But no doubt that Christ is a messenger from God, but they claim to be God, how true that is lying so outright lying, says that his testimony to the same false with it sincere inevitably, it is inevitable lie second statement whatever was said in raising the contradiction. ------------------------------------------ (23) came in when [18:15] words of Christ: However, it is made in the same chapter of the Gospel in the fifth say Christ: Between it tolerated and judged to be a heathen and infidel apparent contradiction Think! ---------------------------------------- (24) stated in Matthew [12:38] that some of the scribes and Pharisees asked Jesus to show them a sign of Christ answered, and said to them: Is understood from the words of Christ (generation) he wanted from the pan was in his day, and the class is a generation of contemporary people. But when it contradicted what he wrote has stated that Christ has done signs and wonders after he said that this generation will not be given a verse! Christ stated that many food and healed the leper, and walked on the sea. . . That what was said when shows that the generation in which Christ does not fall in it except the sign of one, a carrying out of the tomb after three days, all that was narrated by Evangelical of the miracles of Christ are contradictory versions with this phrase in a straight line is strange that he said that words stating limited so as not to can be interpreted. ----------------------------------------- (25) differences about knowing John the Baptist to Christ: If we read what came in the third chapter (when) we find that Christ came to John baptized by John the ban, saying, I have need to be baptized on your hand and you come to me? But Jesus insisted that it deliberately and intentionally when the water rose from the Holy Spirit descended upon it like (pigeons) However, we read in the first chapter of the Gospel (John) that when Jesus came to John to accept it deliberately did not know him and knew him only by the revelation of the Holy Spirit (such as pigeons) from heaven, he settled it. The only difference is clear Gospel (Matthew) that John the Baptist was known before the coming of Christ and the Holy nomadic him and according to the Gospel of John that he did not know until after the descent of the Holy Spirit as a dove it! ------------------------------------------ (26) Mark wrote in [9: 2]: However, Luke wrote in [9:28]: I do not know how increased for two days with Luke that he had committed himself to write the story audited As we promised at the beginning of the first chapter! ----------------------------------------- (27) have reported all of Matthew, Mark, a novel like (farmers) who narrated Christ to the crowd as he sat in the boat and the narrator when contained in [13: 1]: ((that day out of the house and sat on the shore of the lake. I met him great multitudes, He even went up to the boat and sat down, while stopping the whole multitude on the beach. Vklmanm parables in many things, he said: «Behold, the sower went forth to laser p., and while he is grown, he signed some seed on the fairways, and the birds came and ate it.)) The story of Mark contained in [4: 1]: But they occurred in a clear contradiction: When Christ said that when this goes after he had sent the Twelve Apostles and the narrator Send Apostles received when when in [10: 5] But when Mark van Christ had not sent twelve apostles after ten when he spoke this parable novel and send the apostles when Mark received at 6: 7] and the story one time and one place and one. Think ye discerning reader to what Asrdh owners Bibles marketers of the Holy Spirit!! ---------------------------------------
Posted on: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 23:15:01 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015