DTD 07 AUG 2014 TO EX PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA RESPECTED MANMOHAN SINGH JI VEERAPPA MOILY EX MINISTER OF PETROLEUM SONIA GANDHI/RAHUL GANDHI INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS RPT RESPECTED NARENDRA MODI PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA Narayan Singh Rathore 22 December 2013. Friends, ONGC PRBS was going smoothly till 1995. Some disgruntled GM (Fin) took upon himself to destroy PRBS. He misguided 185 young ONGCians to file a Petition 1718/1996 in Bombay HC, contending that PRBS was not Viable Scheme. Said GM (F) managed an Actuarial Valuation Report dt. 2.8.1996 (without examining Financial status of the Trust). As per game plan, ONGC denied Unviability but later on produced the Actaurial Report containing some reference to unviability of PRBS. Honble HC issued Order dated 11.5.1996 calling for ASTO and ONGC to negotiate and raise / generate additional funds to make the scheme viable. Trusties manipulated under able guidance of then Dir. (HR) to revise the Scheme in totality in full violation of Para 31.2 and para 32 of the GOI appd ONGC PRBS Rules-1991 via MOU of 3.2.1998 which was neither to (a) Raise/generate Additional Funds nor (b) in the intrests of members of the Scheme. Director (F) had opined that this MOU required consideration by the Board but Dir. (HR) confirmed that There was no financial implication and hence it was not required to be submitted to the Board. 40 to 60 percent Reduction in Contribution as well as Benefit was not considered as Financial Implication. This Note was never shown to Dir (F). Numerous Representations made to CMD ONGC were just replied by some junior officer in PRBS Trust, with insistent injustice. CMD ONGC was requested to grant personal interview for Hearing our grievances but that never happened. When members started filing litigation in Courts, ONGC took offence and spending billions of rupees to defeat financially defeated members. ONGC deploys Attorney General / Solicitor Generals who prevail in not allowing Hearing of Court cases. ONGC Management is fully aware of colossal sufferings caused by poor financial standing of the Oilmen who brought ONGC to the status of Navratna and Maharatna. CMD ONGC can mitigate these severe grievances with one stroke of his Pen, for withdrawal of illegal, derogatory and un-Constitutional MOU of 3.2.1998 and Cir. 40 of 18.6.1998. You, Nirmal Kumar Srivastava, Premdass Sharma, Mathre Rangarajan and 4 others like this... Nirmal Kumar Srivastava The new defined contribution scheme wef 1st Jan 2007 is noww fully implemented with every one retired on or after 1st Jan 2007 has stared getting additional annuity as per scheme....someone retired about two years back as E-5 with total 28years service getting abot 12000 pm after 1/3rd commutation wrote me that he got one more annuity to giv.e him Rs8700pm extra it means a bonanza of some 21 lakhs more.One ED retired recently got more than 70 lakhs in total including 1/3rd commutation.It means that the limit of 50% is not there.... 23 December 2013 at 05:24 · Like · 2 .. Narayan Singh Rathore Nirmal ji, you are in know of disparity, injustice and partisan approach of ONGC Management in depriving Ex ONGCians their due legitimate entitlement of PRBS during 1996 to March 2007 Why REWA Mumbai is not taking up this issue through Dialogue or legal Process ? There was shaving of Rs.500 crores in 2005 itself and thereafter ONGC pumped more than thousands of crores to mitigate deficiencies. ONGC Management knows very well that grave irregularities have been committed by ONGC PRBS Trust and CMD has authority to rectify them but he has opened treasures to fight illegal battles. Can you discuss this issue for amicable solution, including negotiated settlement with Litigants. We are really getting embarrassed while going to Courts. 23 December 2013 at 17:24 · Like · 1 .. Nirmal Kumar Srivastava Narayan singh I am aware about the disparaties,about the money pumped earlier as well as the amount of Rs1624 one time grant paid by ONGC now to cover up the defecit for paying upto 50% or more to the retirees of 2007 onwards.As u know that we are already involved in a case of Agrani Samman in Bombay High Court and the management once agreed to settle the issue amicably has backed out from their own commitments ...we r left with no alternative except to persue our case with Bombay High Court only.It clearly shows that how much concern they have for our issues.In view of above how do u expect that they will listen to us in PRBS case which does,nt cover 100% retirees pre 2007.While Agrani Samman can cover 21000 retirees,PRBS will cover only 10,700 retirees minus retirees of Jan to March 2007 who are now covered by ONGC in the new scheme.It will be better if some other Association come forward to discuss PRBS issue with management.I personally feel that Nandram will be able to do it after change of guard wef 1st March with Shri DK Sarraf....who is tipped to be next CMD and is a man of Finance known to Nandram. 23 December 2013 at 19:39 · Like · 2 .. Videh Kumar I would like to have names and CPF nos. of two officers cited by Nirmalji so that I do some more study on it because I retired on 31st July 2012 but I have not received any thing so far and my querries are answered that it would take another one month and figure are not as high as indicated here by Nirmalji. Kindly oblige me Nirmakji. 29 December 2013 at 21:08 · Like .. Prem Sagar Gupta Mathre Rangarajan Dear Sri Sri Kureel Saheb, I am very glad to note that you are an LLB from Bangalore University - I dont know in which department you worked in ONGC and when you retired - If it is after 01-01-2007 this discussion becomes only academic to you. I dont understand when you say it is too late by now. I will try to put the case as I understand in a nutshell: We have the Supreme Court judgement of 1982 in Nakras case - As it was given by a full bench under Article 14 of Constitution, I hope it is applicable to ONGC also - ONGC grossly violated this judgement in Agrni Samman case - It is in Bombay High Court. Then there is DPE pay revision order wef 01-01-2007 - It introduces two new factors under Superannuation benefits - ONE: Pension is fourth benefit in addition to CPF, Gratuity and Medical (which was not there earlier) - Two: a fund of 30% of Pay + DA to be created for each individual to cover all these benefits (again which was not there earlier) SC judgement of 1982 stipulates that as retirees are one class, any new benefit given at a later date should also be extended to all previous retirees from that date (to maintain sanctity that all retirees are one class, otherwise it divides retirees into two distinct class). Is this judgement applicable to DPE & ONGC? If so, what is our remedy - Writ petition in SC / Contempt petition in SC / PIL / or any other legal recourse. A sound legal opinion from SC advocate specializing in service matters will be highly useful to all of us. If it is worthwhile then we can persue - If it is otherwise then we can all forget and live peacefully (blaming our fate) and stop all this fruitless discussion. You being a legal person can you get one? - I dont know how much it costs - If it is reasonable I am willing to share the costs - I am sure our other friends may like to pitch in warm regards / rangarajan 18 hours ago · Like.. Srl Kureel many many thanks and regards. I am dec 2003 retiree i was CM(vig). before joining ongc I was administrative officer I I M BANGLORE till 16 feb 83 i personally feel there is good reason to persue the matter i n supreme court by way of special leave petition under ARTICLE 136 of constitution as the is not appeal from high court.pl visit www supremecourtofindia.nic.in/jurisdiction.html 16 hours ago · Like · 1.. Therani Nadathur Venkata Raghavan Dear Sirs, 15 hours ago · Like · 1.. Therani Nadathur Venkata Raghavan canwe follow up it appropriately, consultations may be needed? 15 hours ago · Unlike · 1.. Mathre Rangarajan Thank you Sri SrI Kureel Saheb for some good info - Thanks for reassuring me that there is some substance in my way of thinking and there is some good reason to pursue SLP under article 136 of constitution - I tried to look up what you suggested - but for a non-law person like me it is quite confusing - it says SLP can be against any judgement by High Court etc - But in our case it is a Govt order - it also says it need to be signed by an advocate on roll. I dont know where you are located - I am in Bangalore and SC is too far away for me - please send your personal e-mail ID & mobile No to my ID rangajan@gmail so that I can mail you in detail. Generally speaking, I am very disappointed with our Delhi Unit with proximity to ONGC top & SC and our Dehradun unit with proximity to ONGC Hqrs - They all seem to be busy in their own personal agenda - Only Mumbai unit is fighting one High Court case on behalf of all of us - Ahemedabad unit started some thing but seem to have got cold feet - All other cases in HCs are personal of individuals (they are spending their own money) - It has proved time and again, representations to all and sundry, starting from Smt Sonia Gandhi down to CMD ONGC are futile and completely ignored. I do hope there are some like minded ExONGCians out there who may like to join me in planing and executing some concrete action - Just a wishful thinking warm regards / rangarajan 7 minutes ago · Unlike · 1 3 February at 12:25 · Like · 2 .. Anand Chawla Why , ONGC has not given due consideration to that GROUP ? 30 May at 18:20 · Like .. Narayan Singh Rathore Retired after 01.01.2007 ? Pension Scheme has already been out vide OO dated 26.11.2013. 16 June at 16:13 · Unlike · 1 .. Mathre Rangarajan What is happening tomore tha 100 PRBS cases in various HCs and SE, & Consumer courts? Are they likely to see light of the day before I die - I am 75 17 June at 15:45 · Unlike · 1 Narayan Singh Rathore We are mistaken to expect justice against the wishes of an Oil Giant, capable of tilting judgment on the strength of M power. Unethical processes win over legitimate claims. 21 June at 16:11 · Unlike · 1 Mathre Rangarajan I had only suspected that delay may be on account of what you have said - Now you are confirming my suspicion - It is a great tragedy for us who retired before 2007 - After sacrificing our entire working life, what do we get in the end - Nothing 21 June at 17:41 · Unlike · 1 .. Narayan Singh Rathore One more Feather in Cap of CMD ONGC. His Team has proved that full justice has been done in PRBS matter, prior to Dec. 2006. False Affidavits have prevailed over True facts of grievous Manipulation by PRBS Trust. Courts find it convenient to ignore Data.details of multiple Wrongs by ONGC. INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS RULED INDIA FOR 60 YEARS AND 90 % OF THE CONGRESS MEN ARE MILLIONARIES,BILLIONERIES AND BIG INDUSTRIALISTS,ALL THESE FAMILY MEMBERS OF THEM SITTING ON BLACK MONEY WHICH CAN SUPPORT THERE NEXT TEN GENERATIONS,STILL THEY NEVER LEFT ANY OPPORTUNITIES TO MAKE MONEY,WHICH PROMPTED THERE ALLIES ALSO TO MINT MONEY,SINCE THEY KNEW NO ONE WILL BE ABLE TO CHAALENGE THEM ; THEY MADE ALL THE RULES WHERE THE SAME WILL NOT BE JUSTIBIABLE,EX P.M. WAS A SPINELESS PERSON WHO DID NOT BOTHER TO LISTEN VOICE OF RESENTMENT OF THOSE WHO APPROACHED THEM EVEN 95 TIMES STATING FB REQUESTS ARE NOT AN EYE OPENER,THEY SIMPLY PUT ALL THIS IN WASTE PAPER BASKET,FORGETTING ONE DAY THEY WILL HAVE THERE FACE PAINTED BLACK AND TODAY INC IS BEGGING BOWL EVEN FOR A LEADER OF OPPOSITION STATUS,EXACTLY HOW THEY TREATED BJP FOR LAST FEW DECADES.SHAME,SHAME AND SHAME TO ALL INC LEADERS AND THERE MINISTERS,THEY FORGOT THERE WILL BE MAJOR UPRISING AGAINST THEM,LET THEM WAIT TO SEE ALL CORRUPT CASES OF THEM START COMING IN OPEN NOW,I WISH IF ANY OF THEM REPLY TO THIS IF THEY HAVE ANY LEFT HONESTY ? PREM SAGAR GUPTA RETD GENERAL MANAGER[ ONGC INDIA] I.D. NO 20254 COPY RPT TO EX PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA RESPECTED MANMOHAN SINGH JI VEERAPPA MOILY EX MINISTER OF PETROLEUM SONIA GANDHI/RAHUL GANDHI INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS RPT RESPECTED NARENDRA MODI PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA
Posted on: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:03:59 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015