DUSTIN ENSINGER Staff Writer Sep­a­rate let­ters sent on - TopicsExpress



          

DUSTIN ENSINGER Staff Writer Sep­a­rate let­ters sent on behalf of two employ­ees accus­ing a trustee of “defam­a­tory activ­ity” sparked the Orange Town­ship Board of Trustees this week to pass res­o­lu­tions stat­ing “it does not sup­port, endorse or con­done any behav­ior of the type alleged in the correspondence.” The let­ters, sent by attor­ney David T. Ball on behalf of Orange Town­ship Admin­is­tra­tor Gail Mess­mer and Orange Town­ship Main­te­nance and Parks Direc­tor Beth Hugh, accuse Orange Town­ship Trustee Lisa Knapp of mak­ing “defam­a­tory state­ments” about the town­ship employ­ees. The Mess­mer let­ter also states Knapp took “retal­ia­tory action” against her for “pro­tected activities.” Each res­o­lu­tion passed in a 2–1 vote, with Knapp vot­ing against the mea­sures and call­ing the action “unprecedented.” “This is sim­ply harass­ment and it’s just meant to intim­i­date me,” Knapp said. Trustees Rob Quigley and Deb Taranto said the res­o­lu­tions were designed to pro­vide doc­u­men­ta­tion of the township’s receipt of the let­ters and to make clear the board does not con­done the actions which allegedly occurred. The res­o­lu­tions do not endorse the alle­ga­tions made in the let­ters, Taranto said. “Our goal is to pro­tect the town­ship,” Quigley said. The let­ter on behalf of Mess­mer claims Knapp has actively tried to oust Mess­mer from her posi­tion at the town­ship in the wake of an Ohio Ethics Com­mis­sion com­plaint she filed against Knapp. Hugh’s let­ter accuses Knapp of mak­ing “defam­a­tory com­ments” about her job per­for­mance on sev­eral occasions. Knapp denied all alle­ga­tions made in the let­ters, say­ing they have the “direct intent to embar­rass and harass me.” Knapp has taken action of her own, fil­ing a griev­ance with the Ohio Supreme Court alleg­ing pro­fes­sional mis­con­duct against Ball and Mess­mer, who is a licensed attor­ney in Ohio. She claims the let­ters con­sti­tute a use of the law to bur­den her, a vio­la­tion of Ohio’s pro­fes­sional rules of con­duct of attorneys. “Absolutely not one cor­re­spond­ing shred of evi­dence that would have cor­rob­o­rated any of the state­ments was sub­mit­ted along with the let­ters,” she writes. Knapp has clashed with the township’s other elected offi­cials and sev­eral employ­ees since tak­ing office in Jan­u­ary 2012. Last year, Knapp was accused of clan­des­tinely using a record­ing device dur­ing closed-door ses­sion of a trustee meet­ing. A com­plaint was filed with the Ohio Ethics Com­mis­sion, alleg­ing she vio­lated state law through her dual role as a town­ship trustee and zon­ing clerk in Berlin Township. The Delaware County Sheriff’s Office inves­ti­gated sev­eral inci­dents involv­ing her, includ­ing an alter­ca­tion with Orange Town­ship Fis­cal Offi­cer Joel Spitzer at the town­ship hall as she allegedly tried to access the com­puter in his office, another alle­ga­tion that on a dif­fer­ent occa­sion she entered his office after hours and accessed the same com­puter, and for allegedly tam­per­ing with pub­lic documents. She was not charged in any of the incidents. densinger@civitasmedia
Posted on: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 01:57:33 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015