Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:03:16 -0700 From: tericorbettfelts@yahoo Subject: Re: Merci To: cashbonas@hotmail Hey Cash, so sorry to have drug you into this You have made some very important points in your letter to his attorney. She is going to be writing it herself and with free legal assistance filing the paperwork herself. So if you have any input that pertains to the situation feel free to e-mail it to me. I am assuming you got the letter off to the attorney please let us know if you hear from him. They also sent her a letter letting her know that she had to use an attorney to respond and no legal assistant could help her. Is this true or just another scar tactic? Thanks … From: cashbonas@hotmail To: tericorbettfelts@yahoo Subject: RE: Merci Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 14:06:44 -0600 Teri: What I have showed you, with real rules (not someone putting inc to paper, but US cases) is that yes, of course Merci can represent herself - that is a no brainer. Its more than that, however. What I showed you was that anyone can represent Merci, including you, me or anyone else. Granted, the caliber of any given representation varies with experience. All an advocate is a voice for those without, a speaker so to speak, to aid in translating and presenting - in and out of court. Bottom line - lords do not like opposition. Did you know that the private company called Bar is a major land lord business operation? Here is an article of proof - crazy stuff really: For about eight years, Sharon Pearl collected rent from the tenants leasing space in the California Bar building at 180 Howard St. in San Francisco. Only it may have been going into her own pockets. Late Monday, the attorney generals office filed embezzlement and tax evasion charges against the ... Bars former director of real property, and accused her of keeping more than $675,000 in rent and related payments by tenants. The defendant managed to get away with embezzling money from right under the noses of her co-workers for years, Attorney General Jerry Brown said in a prepared statement. She was responsible for collecting rent from tenants. But instead of turning over the rent to the State Bar, she decided to use the money for a lavish lifestyle. Pearl couldnt be reached for comment on Tuesday. An Oakland telephone number listed for her had been disconnected, and Fremont, Calif., lawyer Leon Mezzetti, whom the AGs office said is representing her, didnt return a call seeking comment. Pearl, who was fired on Oct. 3, is expected to turn herself in to the Alameda County Sheriffs Department and be booked on $80,000 bail. law/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202429762889 [End excerpt] It is a business operation and they publish a lot of disinformation - no joke! They also sell insurance, credit cards and other stuff. Most people dont understand what IT is, and they do not understand that when something has your all capitalized name on it - it isnt real and it is not you, like spelling MERCI as opposed to Merci. It is a power issue. Merci should respond to the court and invoke U.C.C. 1-207, without prejudice - all rights reserved Without Prejudice UCC 1-207 above your signature not only puts a condition on an unconditional contract, but also reserves all your rights under Article III Judicial. Police power is void unless crime and probable cause exist. landrights/UCC_1-207.htm The short bits attached might be useful in your understanding my CV and what I call the IT problem, in part. Back to Merci - I think you probably know exactly what they are trying or attempting to do! I concur with you: [H]ow dare they send that letter! Save the letter, it is very valuable viewed in context of the10-02-09 short brief with exhibits - very valuable indeed are those to bits put together! There is an art called the Art of Void Contracts and it turns on price right proof. See attached proof - the study! Warmest Regards, P.S. IT Docs viewable without download, in color, are located here: ________________________________________ Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:35:14 -0700 From: tericorbettfelts@yahoo Subject: Re: Merci To: cashbonas@hotmail So you are saying that she can definitely represent herself? If so how dare they send that letter! What should she say in LAYMAN TERMS!!! About what they are trying to do? Teri ________________________________________ From: Cash Bonas To: tericorbettfelts@yahoo Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2009 11:28:30 AM Subject: RE: Merci A flat scare tactic and 100% untrue, which is why I cite United States Supreme Court cases on it. There is a lot of deep disinformation out their about IT. Bottom line - they know she cant afford representation and they do not want her to be represented or to have a clear voice on clear issues. You can represent her without ever having gone to law school - period. That issue I think I shall brief for clarification to others on the point. Second, with regard to one’s forgotten rights, I remind: ● The right to file a lawsuit pro se is one of the most important rights under the constitution and laws.[1] ● The practice of law cannot be licensed by any state/State.[2] ● The practice of law is an occupation of common right.[3] It will be an evil day for American Liberty if the theory of a government outside supreme law finds lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this Court than to exert its full authority to prevent all violations of the principles of the Constitution.[4] ________________________________________ [1] Elmore v. McCammon (1986) 640 F. Supp. 905 (1986). [2] Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 (1957). [3] Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925). [4] Downs v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901) She should save that letter or e-mail. Short bits about misinformation and disinformation and our adversary system is attached for your use and/or information. Kind regards, ________________________________________ Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:03:16 -0700 From: tericorbettfelts@yahoo Subject: Re: Merci To: cashbonas@hotmail Hey Cash, so sorry to have drug you into this You have made some very important points in your letter to his attorney. She is going to be writing it herself and with free legal assistance filing the paperwork herself. So if you have any input that pertains to the situation feel free to e-mail it to me. I am assuming you got the letter off to the attorney please let us know if you hear from him. They also sent her a letter letting her know that she had to use an attorney to respond and no legal assistant could help her. Is this true or just another scar tactic? Thanks ________________________________________ From: Cash Bonas To: tericorbettfelts@yahoo Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2009 10:51:36 AM Subject: RE: Merci Thank you. Shall I drop the file off at your office or shall I pop them in the mail? Warmest Regards, P.S. IT Docs viewable without download, in color, are located here: docstoc/profile/cashbonas > Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:27:36 -0700 > From: tericorbettfelts@yahoo > Subject: Merci > To: cashbonas@hotmail > > Hi Cash, > > Just left you a couple of messages about Mercis concerns about your approach. She is feeling at this time that she wants to take a less aggressive approach and will be using some one else to respond to Mr. Smith. Thanks for your time and effort. > > Teri Felts
Posted on: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:46:46 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015