Defamation of character is an offense for which a complainant may be eligible to bring another party to civil court. There are two types of defamation: spoken defamation, or slander, and written defamation, or libel. Law Dictionary: When to Sue for Defamation, Slander, and Libel The balance that makes defamation law tricky is that the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution gives people the right of free speech. On the other hand,people should not be able to ruin the lives of others by disseminating lies to force a business to shut down or compel the breakdown of family.Laws regarding defamation vary from state to state, but generally speaking, four criteria must be met for a slander or libel suit to stand a chance of success. The defamation, whether written or spoken, must be: Demonstrably and objectively false Seen or heard by a public third party Quantifiably injurious Unprivileged by law Defamation Must Be Objectively False It is not against the law to say mean things about somebody if they are either true or if they are entirely subjective. For instance, if a restaurant critic says that the food was the worst Ive had in a long time, the statement, while mean, is vague and subjective enough to avoid a lawsuit. Similarly, environmental activists who make the public aware of corporate practices that harm the earth cant be sued for defamation as long as they report on the facts. Defamation Must Be Published In order to prove injury, you have to prove that other people saw it, heard it, read it and had their minds changed because of the slanderous or libelous statements. Courts generally consider libel to be more serious than slander because writing lasts longer, though major television broadcasts often carry the same weight as major print or web publications because more people viewed them. Defamation Must Cause Financial Injury In order to determine the damages from a slander or libel suit, there must be quantifiable damages. Defamation of character damages a persons or companys reputation, and it must be proven that the damage to reputation correlated with a loss of money, property, relationship or was subject to harassment that led to any of the above losses. SINCE MATT ISNT LOSING MONEY. GOOD LUCK IN YOUR LIBEL CRAP. SINCE IN HIS OWN WORDS HE ISNT DOING THIS FOR MONEY ITS STRICTLY VOLUNTEER. WHICH IF NEED BE I CAN PROVIDE HIS OWN WRITTEN COMMENTS CONFIRMING THIS.ALSO JUST LIKE PROVING WHAT IS STATED IS FALSE. MATT IS HERE ON A EXPIRED VISA AND HE HAS STAYED WITH VULNERABLE WOMEN WHOM HE IS ATTEMPTING TO BE AN ADVOCATE FOR I HAVE NEVER HEARD OF AN ADVOCATE THAT MOVES IN WITH PEOPLE WHO THEY ARE TRYING TO HELP. SO PLEASE PROVIDE PROOF CONTRARY TO THE FACT THAT HIS VISA IS VALID AND THAT HE ISNT AND HASNT STAYED WITH VULNERABLE FAMILIES (husband and wives) I can provide proof of this too. So again Mr Hutton your coming on here with these grasping at straw comments are not anything I am concerned with.
Posted on: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 19:28:29 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015