Did you know that Mexico has its own electrical union which will be celebrating its 100th birthday next year? That their government used the military and police to fire all 44,000 of their membership, then bribed 28,000? Four years later 14,000 of them are still fighting, and the gentleman interviewed in this article spoke at the IBEW EWMC leadership conference yesterday. No Matter What the Result, We Will Continue to Resist, Says Mexican Electrical Workers Union Leader Humberto Montes de Oca is the international secretary for the Mexican Electrical Workers union. Two years ago, its 44,000 members were all fired when the Mexican government took over generating stations by force to set the stage for privatizing electricity. Montes de Oca describes the role the union has played on the left in Mexico, its resistance to privatization and the way fired workers are now forced to migrate to survive. He was interviewed by David Bacon. Our organization is the oldest democratic union in Mexico. The Mexican Electrical Workers Union [SME by its Spanish initials] was founded in 1914 when the armies of Emiliano Zapata took Mexico City. Our founders saw that the peasant insurrection would finally create the conditions for their efforts to organize and succeed. Theyd already made many attempts to set up the union in underground conditions and endured repression because of it. In 1916, we organized Mexicos first general strike. Our leaders were imprisoned and condemned to death, but their lives were saved by huge demonstrations. In 1936, we went on strike against the Mexican Power and Light Company, which at that time had US, British and Canadian owners. Mexico City went without electricity for ninety days, except for emergency medical services. The strike was successful and led to the negotiation of one of the most important labor contracts in Latin America. That strike helped set the stage for the nationalization of oil, and created the political conditions that made the expropriation possible. Then in 1960, we were one of the organizations that pushed for the nationalization of electrical power. President Adolfo Lopez Mateos modified Article 27 of the Mexican Constitution and added a paragraph that says that the Mexican government has the exclusive right to provide electricity to the country. Since then, under the Constitution, public electrical service can be provided only by the state. In 1992, President Carlos Salinas de Gortari changed the regulations to take some kinds of electrical generation out of the public sphere and since then a lot has been in private hands. This started a process of privatizing electricity through secondary laws. In 1994, the company Power and Light was decentralized and it was closed in 2009, putting its 44,000 workers out in the streets. For the previous ten years, these workers, members of the SME, had resisted the privatization of electricity. In 1999, then-President Ernesto Zedillo launched an effort to privatize it through Constitutional reform, by eliminating the 6th paragraph of Article 27, which made the industry the exclusive property of our nation. Zedillo tried to dismantle it. He proposed allowing the creation of private companies for the generating, transmission, distribution and sale of power. The union reacted quickly to stop it. We formed a front of resistance and we succeeded because we were able to bring together many social movements that were opposed to privatization. Zedillos proposal was defeated. Leobardo Benitez Alvarez lived in a tent in front of the office of the Federal Electricity Commission on the Reforma in downtown Mexico City for months, protesting the actions of the Mexican government in firing 44,000 electrical workers and smashing their union. Later, President Vicente Fox made another attempt at privatization. This time he didnt try to change the Constitution. He tried to change the Public Law for Providing Electricity, a secondary law. He wanted the public enterprises to supply electricity only to homes. Private enterprises would provide it to large-scale consumers, like commercial and industrial users. This initiative was also defeated. In the same way, the union organized a front of organizations against it. The experience of the past privatizations, including even those in the US, is that private owners invest their money to make a profit, not to provide a service. That affects the users of services, because the rates they pay go up while the quality of the services provided goes down. Investors care only about their profits. They dont invest in maintenance or in the means by which the service is provided. High rates and deficient service, in other words. For workers, it means losing what weve achieved over decades of struggle. Things start going backwards. What we have now isnt some kind of privilege, but rights that cost a lot to win. They are the minimum which allow us to work with dignity and support our families and ourselves. One important aspect of our contract is called the agreement among different parties. This requires the company management to consult with the union about changes they want to make that affect our work. In other words, they cant make unilateral changes. Few other unions have this and weve used it to protect users and ratepayers. One of the many mass demonstrations in the Zocalo in Mexico City, protesting the firing of SME members. The contract covers benefits as well. We have strong protections for health and safety that force the company to maintain a safe workplace, as well as changing rooms and showers. We have vacations and sick leave and we can take leaves of absence. We have a fund that helps workers find adequate housing. If youve worked there a long time, the company will help you build or buy a home. We have the aguinaldo [an extra months salary distributed at the end of the year] and a savings fund in which the company matches what workers contribute. Basically, our contract means that we have the minimum conditions you need for a decent life. Really, the only effort to privatize electricity that succeeded was that of 1992. Eventually, 50% of the power in Mexico was produced by private generators in a process that was known as hidden generation. After the subsequent privatization efforts were defeated, the rightwing governments, with their neoliberal policies, decided to use force, to privatize through action, rather than legislation. We say they tried to take the fish out of the fishbowl and when that didnt work, to break the bowl. Before taking action, the government mounted a campaign for months to discredit the company, the workers and our union. It intervened directly in the life of our union, in violation of the law, seeking to divide workers and buy off some of the unions leaders. The government refused to recognize our elected leadership, as a way of denying our union its legal right to exist and function. The government sought to turn public opinion against us. To ratepayers, it said the company wasnt productive, that it was inefficient and had become a public charge. The workers were privileged and their contract was expensive and a burden on the Mexican people. The union was inflexible and corrupt, they said and the workers were lazy. All this was on radio, on TV and in the movies - everywhere, creating the preconditions for action. Then on October 9, 2009, President Felipe Calderon issued a decree to end the existence of Power and Light and brought in 27,000 soldiers and Federal police to expel our members from their workplaces. This was a military assault on workers. Many of us were injured in the violence. Since then, the Federal Preventive Police have continued an occupation of our worksites. Theyve stolen tools and equipment. Theyre looting the company. There was no judicial order and the action violated the Constitution and Mexican law. Immediately after, the government published a decree against the union and launched a campaign to defend its use of the military against workers. The closing of the company was portrayed as justified and in the best interest of the Mexican people. Calderon went on TV and said that with the closing of the company the electrical rates would go down and the quality of service would improve. There would be more generation and wed have thousands of new jobs. That justified his authoritarian and illegal action. But the president has no authority to close a national public enterprise that has a strategic value to the nation. Only Congress can take such an action and end the existence of a company. The government violated the labor and human rights of the workers, without even a hearing about these issues. There was no warning about the firings, which violates the labor law. There was no notice to the labor board that a conflict existed - without it the workers have a right to stay in their jobs. The decree dissolving the company was clearly illegal. It had no right to cancel our labor contract or dissolve our union either. The government had a secret document that was recently declassified. In it, they analyze the possible effects of destroying our union and predict that we wouldnt last more than three months. It predicted wed be violent and that wed try to reenter our workplaces by force. Thats why the brought in thousands of police and soldiers. One high military officer revealed that it wasnt the police that took control of our workplace, but the army. They were prepared to repel any action by workers and stop any sabotage of our workplaces. But we never would do that. We have a historical memory and weve resisted the government before. In July 2012, Calderon will be gone and well still be here. To read more about the Mexican government bribing workers and what happened next, click the link below.
Posted on: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 00:23:20 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015