Disclaimer: a man, Edward-Malone: Johnston U.C.C. 1-308 All Rights Reserved: (Rev. 10 12/2014) https://youtube/watch?v=WyXteb01PAQ Edward-Malone: Johnston U.C.C. 1-308 All Rights Reserved: (Rev. 10 12/2014) Disclaimer: man, edward-malone johnston , non-corporate entity reserve the right to amend or make further corrections to this document as further information becomes available. Furthermore, I do not agree to any Civil and or Criminal Penalties whereas documents taken from Congressional Record, IRS Code, Farm Bills, Trading With the Enemies Act, Legislative Procedures Act, Court rulings and decisions and the Bankruptcy Acts – now 4 – of these United States, et al and Birth Record Fraud Scheme, Bond, C.U.S.I.P., Commodities Fraud, Theft of and or misuse of CESTA QUE VIE TRUST, AKA, ONE PEOPLES PUBLIC TRUST ACCOUNTS which were to be established so the men and women could pay their debts as all lawful money was stolen from us lawful Americans of the 1866 treaty from the new devil contractors of 1871 defacto from the treaty of 1213 the beginning, Now of the 1933 banking act of treason to gods gift of freedom. now called Mans statutes codes and administration rules that have been created, treason against the United states for lawful Americans Gods Constitution of freedom the garden of eden, As by Roosevelt and his coconspirators AKA the Vatican, British Empire, International Bankers the new devil contractors of no emotions and feeling now called business , et al. The FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE a debt instrument merely discharges the debt house resolution 192 applies for lawful Americans not foreign agents, Breach of Public Trust and Misprision by the Congress of the United States, AKA federal servants that are lawful Americans employees to serve, Fiduciary Trustees, in dealing with the Bankruptcy Act(s) of 1933 and acts of TREASON by Franklin D. Roosevelt, Congress and the Receivers of the Bankruptcies. 1779 without amendment the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, dba, FATISH CORPORATION, a French Corporation - Congress has refused to provide names of the 3 parties who formed this Corporation – an act of treason. (28 U.S.C. @ 3002 Definitions 15) United States means A) a Federal Corporation – de facto government. Between March 3 – 5 1861 12 States walked out of Congress in Secession, see Rulings of the Attorney General B. J. Black published 1863, and Congress was forced to adjourn Without Day; became Sin Die, never to meet again, the next day as they did not have enough votes to call the next session – see Congressional Record March 5 – July 15, 1861. Every Legislative Act since is fraud in the inducement. Welcome to the Dictatorship – de facto Government. It should be herein noted that in the 1933 Bankruptcy Act all Offices, Agencies and Departments were turned over to the Receivers, unknown, of the Bankruptcy, via the United Nations – 12 years before that became and Organization, and All Law and Statutes became international law and copy written AKA Lawless America. Any nation once bankrupt is no longer sovereign. Are you practicing Corporate Policy instead of law? Prove it. Also read the 16th American Jurist prudence, Second Edition, Section 177...any law written in violation of this Constitution is as though it were never written and no one is obligated to obey it.......; massive voter fraud. NOTICE: The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS A CROWN/VATICAN/SWISS BANK Property the result of land theft by the Pope from the Great Marzocco. ( A fraud scheme the result of the 1933 ;Bankruptcy Act & G5. Trustees Are: The Pope, British Monarch, U.S. Postmaster See 28 U.S.C. @ 3002 Definitions 15) United States means A) a Federal Corporation. AKA French. Now consider the beginning of the Court Fraud Scheme and the establishment of the Court system AKA Renaissance whereas the CATHOLIC CULT AKA CHURCH via 4-Popes, AKA, Jesuits, and bought into the Courts and Royalty and remain to this day controlling the Judicial system, AKA, the Bank. The Court case number is the Account number from which the Court, aka, Bank is running their Bond, C.U.S.I.P. , and commodities fraud scheme against all defendants, pro se, and private man/woman litigants who enter thereof. It is a Ponzi Scheme. Show me your conflict of interest statement(s). Contracting in violation of uberrimae fidei – of utmost good faith and uberrima Fideas – utmost good faith. (Ref. BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY 8th EDITION pg. 1558.) No court papers are disclosing as a contract; Nor have a proper identity from the OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (OMB NUMBER), fail to provide their Commodities license information nor their Bonding information nor the C.U.S.I.P.: (CUSIP stands for Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures. Formed in 1962, this committee developed a system (implemented in 1967) that identifies securities, specifically U.S. and Canadian registered stocks, and U.S. government and municipal bonds.) Now show me your conflict of interest statement(s). SMITH v. CITY OF CUMMING - FindLaw - Findlaw: Cases and Codes caselaw.findlaw/us-11th-circuit/1418743.html FindLaw provides SMITH v. CITY OF CUMMING, No ... that they had a First Amendment right, ... a “First Amendment right to film matters of public Information in the nature of a quo warranto. A proceeding against the usurper of a franchise or office. Jarman v. Ma...son, 102 Okl. 278, 229 P. 459, 460.; An extraordinary proceeding, prerogative in nature, addressed to preventing a continued exercise of authority unlawfully asserted. Johnson v. Manhattan Ry. Co., N.Y., 53 S.Ct. 721, 289 U.S. 479, 77 L.Ed. 1331. watch the Video at nationallibertyalliance.org/ My RIGHT OF DEFENSE AGAINST UNLAWFUL ARREST Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officers life if necessary.î Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: ìWhere the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.î An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.î Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621. When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified.î Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1. These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.î Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903. An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.î (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260). Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.î (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100). One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.î (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910). Story affirmed the right of self-defense by persons held illegally. In his own writings, he had admitted that ëa situation could arise in which the checks-and-balances principle ceased to work and the various branches of government concurred in a gross usurpation.í There would be no usual remedy by changing the law or passing an amendment to the Constitution, should the oppressed party be a minority. Story concluded, ëIf there be any remedy at all ... it is a remedy never provided for by human institutions.í That was the ëultimate right of all human beings in extreme cases to resist oppression, and to apply force against ruinous injustice.íî (From Mutiny on the Amistad by Howard Jones, Oxford University Press, 1987, an account of the reading of the decision in the case by Justice Joseph Story of the Supreme Court. As for grounds for arrest: ìThe carrying of arms in a quiet, peaceable, and orderly manner, concealed on or about the person, is not a breach of the peace. Nor does such an act of itself, lead to a breach of the peace.î (Whartonís Criminal and Civil Procedure, 12th Ed., Vol.2: Judy v. Lashley, 5 W. Va. 628, 41 S.E. 197) My case rests to be true thereof: Thereof: __Autograph on file _________________________________________Seal____________ a living , breathing , man, edward -malone: johnston (non-corporation)
Posted on: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 15:40:59 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015