EVERY JUDGE/MAGISTRATE WHO SIT IN ON ADMISTRATIVE COURT HEARINGS IS GUILTY OF THIS OFFENCE: Statement of Offence: Administering an unlawful Oath, contrary to Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. Particulars of Offence: ……………………………(+) being a Judge/Magistrate (-) for the county of ………………………..(+) on the ………… day of ………………………. unlawfully administered an Oath to ………………………………………… (+) in a manner which the said Judge/Magistrate (-) had no jurisdiction, namely: The Judge/Magistrate (-) has sworn an Oath to well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth the Second in the Office of Judge/Magistrate (-), and to do right by all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm, without fear or favour, affectation or ill-will. The aforesaid Oath does not authorize any Judge/Magistrate (-) in the Common Law Jurisdiction of England and Wales to adjudicate any Hearing in which the matter is to be decided in any way other than by a Jury. Furthermore, in the Hearing in question there was no Injured Party, no corpus delecti, and no Defendant. Therefore the Common Law Oath under which the Judge/Magistrate (-) claimed authority is unlawful and constitutes an offence contrary to Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. The fact that the Judge/Magistrate (-) sat is considered to be prima facie evidence of the offence. These Sworn Court Officer are taking the piss stealing money from the Revenue Public Fund of which they make no contribution. Remember their Public Oath is their CONTRACT to the Public. Hold them to their contract and Liquidate their Corporate Bond and file criminal complaint against them for Malfeasance Misconduct in public office and have them removed from public office, easier than you would imagine!!!Peace and Love
Posted on: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 20:45:57 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015