Ebola virus False Positive test results: A person receiving a false positive may be placed into an Ebola ward, where he or she will have an increased risk of becoming infected with Ebola, malaria, etc. [So a False Positive is handy to anyone who wishes to get rid of specific individuals.] False Negative test results: A person receiving false negative may be released to the public or to his/her family, increasing Ebola contagion, and when symptoms appear in this patient, he or she will not think the disease is Ebola because he/she had received a clean bill of health thru the Ebola test result (even though that result was incorrect). [So a False Negative is handy to anyone wishing to target a certain family or a certain neighborhood, to give them increased levels of Ebola virus disease.] [quoted material follows: ] While a false positive can clearly put an individual at unnecessary risk by causing the person to be placed in a high-risk environment (e.g., an Ebola isolation ward), more serious consequences can occur from false negatives. With a false-negative result, a person may be released into the community with the understanding that they do not have EHF, when in fact they have the potential to become highly contagious and, at least initially, assume their symptoms are not due to EHF. [both of these false test result methods, if known to be 100 percent accurate, would be handier to the controllers, than if they occurred randomly or spontaneously. also this is true for true negative and true positive tests. if the people controlling the testing know the result before the test is done, i.e., if they can deliberately use and apply a 100 percent dependable false positive or 100 percent dependable false negative test, and if they also have tests that are somehow 100 percent dependable for both of the true tests, then they can control the epidemic very precisely, at least in the publicly released information from the outbreak area. Actual control of the epidemic would be another matter, but that could be done by using and applying a known proven cure, which is precisely what Nano Silver 10 ppm is known to be according to the US DOD DTRA 2009 report. Acronyms stand for United States Dept. of Defense, Defense Threat Reduction Agency. it should be noted that this is speculative, but when the USA govt seems to censor information about a known cure, the only known Ebola cure, in fact, the gloves come off.] jvi.asm.org/content/78/8/4330.long
Posted on: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 02:36:40 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015