Ever since Barack Obama won reelection last November, he and his minions have become increasingly emboldened in their efforts to dismantle this once great nation, and replace it with a broken-down socialist “democracy” more to their liking. The hounds of liberalism are feeling energized and believe their cause has been validated by the voters. So they increasingly assert their vision for America’s makeover in terms that suggest it is a done deal. Meanwhile, as their beloved leader, Barack Obama is tasked with the responsibility to keep putting a good face on the unfolding catastrophe and deflecting attention from the many dire consequences that have already resulted from his Marxist governing philosophy. If blaming former President George W. Bush for all of America’s problems no longer resonates with the public, then Obama will simply have to readjust his story in order to continue implementing the policies that have so damaged this nation, while dodging any blame for them. ... The nation’s highest office holder was never intended to be the executor of a pick-and-choose legal system. Such activity has historically been the realm of monarchies and, more specifically tyrannies. At its founding, America’s government was constructed in such a manner as to prevent discretionary enforcement of the law, which in fact is no law whatsoever. Barack Obama has no more authority to arbitrarily delay the implementation of his own “healthcare” monstrosity than can he unilaterally declare himself emperor. ... Many on the right have expressed outrage over Obama’s comment during his July 26 meeting with the Vietnamese president Truong Tan Sang, asserting philosophical common ground between Thomas Jefferson and Vietnam’s pivotal Marxist leader, Ho Chi Minh. Though the comparison is absurd, it should hardly shock anyone. In any given circumstance, Barack Obama will resort to any words he deems necessary to pander. Yet the stark chasm that differentiates America’s glorious birth of freedom from the massive genocidal oppression of Southeast Asia may indeed escape him. And in consideration of his total lack of historical understanding, it is entirely likely that he may not be able to discern any tangible difference between the two, other than the fact that Jefferson owned slaves.
Posted on: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:16:08 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015