Excerpts: Just so you dont get played as was intended by the government boys, the illusion spoon fed us that you parroted below: We have a rubber stamp government, run by large corporations Well, it was that way in the 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, and going into the 60s. But a big transition took place going into the beginning of the 50s to the end of the 60s that culminated by the mid 90s and was absolute come 2000. The corporations, banks, insurance, and brokerage companies from the 30s to 60s were constantly seeking government funds and investment capital. They thought they could influence the same. They got it each year at an ever increasing rate. That old saying of: Walk into my pallor said the spider to the fly doomed those companies to takeover by the eager hand of government. Come the 70s collective local and federal government was well on its way to taking over controlling interest in those companies by direct investment and cash funding to the same. Little by little bit collective government would invest each year on average 3% to 5% of their gross income. On a good year 7% to 8%. One of my favorite expressions when it comes down to governments investments for takeover is: there are only so many nickles to a dollar. Come the 90s collective local and federal government owned the majority of those companies by investment, and was calling the shots as the primary investor. They called the shots and those holdings were being networked via private associations covertly established by the government players themselves. Private associations like GFOA.org, GASB.org, council of Mayors - State Managers - Governors - etc. And lets not forget two of the largest private associations: The Democratic and Republican parties. The comprehension or even a cognitive thought generated in the public per the reality of the obvious nature of what was taking place in their face and right under their noses was diligently held back from them through massive efforts applied in all relevant communication mediums that were covertly taken over DUE TO THE MONEY and wealth ever growing involved. The public never comprehended the scope and size of the government takeover. The distractions, misdirections, and irrelevant promotions the public was constantly spoon fed to maintain and create a void as to the obvious was masterfully played out each and every day. For the last 10-years I have wanted to write a book entitled; The decades of masterful entertainment applied - The road to Government takeover and ruin In the 80s and 90s collective US Government doing so well on the domestic front turned their focus on international takeover starting with Mexico in the 80s, moving on to India and the Soviet block countries in the 90s, and as of 2000 the big cherry to pick, China. To pull this off it was required to keep the population delusional and misdirected to virtually the opposite thinking over the reality of the situation taking place and they pulled it off due to the massive wealth involved. The population parrots almost exactly what they are directed to parrot contrary to the basic glaring them right in the face reality of: 1. Governments increase in their gross income each and every year (almost a 3000% increase on average in 35 years) 2. Collective Governments increase in their domestic and International investment holdings (collectively now the primary owner of any relevant large corporation, mortgage, loans, debt instruments and totaling in value as a conservative estimate 110 trillion domestically plus another 45 trillion internationally) 3. Why do these large corporations seem to get a pass-card and policy set to do as they wish reaping in massive profits when in some case those profits generated are seriously in conflict with or in direct conflict with the publics interest and well being? The answer there is realized with another question and answer: How do you get the full cooperation of government? ANSWER: Give government the largest percentage of the take. (Bank policy; trade policy; market regulatory policy; Insurance / mortgage / loan policy over the last several decades was designed to benefit primarily the largest controlling investor - collective local and federal government) TREASON: Treason doth never prosper; whats the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason. Sir John Harrington, 1561-1612 cafr1/DDAWhoProfits.h
Posted on: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 21:47:06 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015