FYI: I dont actively use any biblical historical resources in a - TopicsExpress



          

FYI: I dont actively use any biblical historical resources in a public school setting as it is not legal (in my meek understanding). At some time in history, separation/wall of church & state was revised in definition for public schools as not using the Bible as a resource. However, Im on Facebook. My personal belief/opinion based on a historical resource found in Matthew 18:20 is that the church is not buildings, but rather people. This is the resource Im basing my freedom of opinion upon. Matthew 18:20 King James Version (KJV) 20 For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them. This is a wall/separation that is hindering understanding of history by not allowing the bible books included as resources of study. Our yearly calendar was historically based from this resource! Comparison: Separation of Church/people and State/people is like putting atheists on one side of the wall and any with a religion on the other side. IDK where the agnostics would be at but they are open to study through resources/people. American citizens should have the right through freedom to independently declare their opinions. As living people we are resources of life experiences/reflections. Everything communicated throughout history and the present has been from communication in some form on earth. Missouri stemmed from the original 13 colonies! IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776. The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Natures God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
Posted on: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 16:56:46 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015