Firstly, she presents feminism as a monolith, with herself as spokesperson, intentionally eliding debates within the ideology. Secondly, she claims to only be a critic, but behaves as a would-be censor. Thirdly, her research suffers from non-transparency, clear confirmation bias, and an underreliance on actual scholarship. Fourthly, her attempts to criticize games on their own terms are often either inaccurate or unreasonably uncharitable, and can suffer from clear double standards. Fifthly, she structures her arguments so as to make them unfalsifiable. Sixthly, her theory of gender relations is unrealistically antagonistic and designed to promote rancor between men and women.
Posted on: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 06:48:15 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015