Flight. I was a flight risk, according to your George Bush government. https://youtube/watch?v=qRK57gaoldg Staff, Overlooked academic rules, applicable to all sectors our local home-business and business-business activities are here provided. The missing points here highlight the “split lane” between obligation of honest disclosures and bad faith concealment. Obligation requires independent, isolated cost element and reasonable markup pricing, as instructed in every business and economics textbook – it’s called nations’ law. Time is obviously a central factor in this study – time working, labor time. A) “An hourly price-rate includes the cost of a salary, fringe benefits and overhead costs.” “The … hourly price-rate … includes an overhead cost component known at the time of billing.” B) “Even superficial independent undertaking requires first a reduction of the average day-wage (in the labor embodied in the parts, e.g.).” C) “In a competitive market price is equal to cost and each seller knows his own cost.” Time measures quantity. We measure time and quality. D) Contract “Exchange-value is a definite social expression, by numbers on paper, of the amount of labor bestowed upon an object.” Dispute resides in what costs are and are not included. Reducing cost factors reduces the price, so the price maker typically attempts to inflate costs. What “cost factors ingredients” are not permitted is a straightforward “counting” matter. The Beasley case, citing Garrett, illustrates. “The Firm contends the Garrett measure … includes not only the direct increased costs … resulting from … activity …, but also indirect costs, such as overhead, that are attributable to the … maintenance of an in place infrastructure for dealing with … activity generally …. This contention flows from the evidence given by … expert witness …, who testified making no effort to determine costs ….” “This standard requires a direct causal link …. “No recovery … for unrelated overhead costs”. “Even if we construe … so broadly as to encompass … theory of compensable indirect costs … and … conditions, that does not mean we must accept … opinion as to the amount of those costs.” “The … expert … testified that … estimates were wrong because they did not connect costs to specific … activities and included overhead that would have existed even without … activity, and also because it overstated many costs. Indeed, most reductions were attributable to the overstatement theory.” Compared, bad faith or “declared illegal” pricing skips textbook cost pricing law by getting and using a rival’s price points and pricing above, at or a little under those prices, without conducing cost element price paperwork. “Bad faith … involves actual or constructive fraud, or a design to mislead or deceive another, or a neglect or refusal to fulfill some duty or some contractual obligation, not prompted by an honest mistake as to one’s rights or duties, but by some interested or sinister motive. Collins v. City of Los Angeles, Cal.App.4th (2012). Karl Marx, Das Kapital Part II: The Transformation Of Money Into Capital: Ch. VI: The Buying & Selling of Labor! Antitrust Law, An Economic Perspective, Ch 7, at 133, 136 (Univ. of Chic. Press, 1976); U.S. v. Container, 393 U.S. 333 (1969). Karl Marx, On Capital, Part I, 3:10. Karl Marx, On Capital, Part 1 Commodities & Money (“Nature has fixed the course of exchange”). Beasley v. Wells Fargo Bank, 235 Cal.App.3d 1395 (1991).
Posted on: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 02:16:46 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015