For the fact that CHE structured by nul products, they will try by all means to gave media the incorrect or preliminary information (data that has no true reflection) based on LUCT.However the WORLD and SAQA are now recognizing LUCT.LUCT has been operated for more than 20 yrs around the entire world and given Accreditation, but CHE established only by 2010 (3yrs).Do u think there will be justification,fairly,realistic and transparent when scrutinizing the process of accreditation? Remember the products of nul are resistence to change.if not the country could have gone too fair rite now bcuz majority leaders are frm nul.But now Lesotho is 20 years back compare to other countries.So this people have inferior complex towards LUCT(fear of unknown).LUCT is not competing with nul,its only technology countries can say a word based on programs. Guys, here is true scenario reflection,there are post frm LUCT for master and PHD but no one applied for those post.so what can we do?This is not our problem that the country that is leading by nul product has scarcity resources of technology yet nul is doing computer science.What is that?a theory? of course 70% is theory while 30% pratical.But LUCT offers 70% on praticals in all programs, the purpose is for the students to be well equipped upon their arrivals on the industry.LA UTLOAHALA LIQHITI TSA LUCT LESTHO.WE ARE THE BEST INSTUTITE THE WHOLE ENTIRE WORLD,THE WORLD IS RECOGNIZING US BUT ONLY SMALL PORTION OF BASOTHO (NUL PRODUCT) ARE RESISTENCE TO CHANGE OR RECOGNIZE US.BASOTHO BANA LE MATHATA NTLAFATSONG EA THUTU.ERE BARE FE MONYE OTLARE BONA RONA BA LUCT-LESOTHO.RE ETSA LINTHO HAND ESENG HOSASA...SHARP
Posted on: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:48:25 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015