Giving the alarmists credit for ANYTHING they hypothesize is way TOO much. Theyve all been shown to have no credibility. None. Their models all assume that most of the warming is due to water vapor feedback, pushing temperature up 2 to 3 times thei increase brought on by co2. (Everything in the prior sentence is based on pure speculation. Nobody understands feedback, Theres no correleation (none, nada, zilch) showing that co2 increase causes any global temperature increase. The atmosphere is hardly comparable to a greenhouse. Satellites measurements show heat escaping to space. Convection does not operate across firm greenhouse boundaries. Whats more, the models pay no attention to the fact that, as co2 level increases, its capability to influence temperature diminishes. Theres only a few very narrow sun bandwidths of energy that co2 can absorb, and evidently 50% of that bandwidth was used up when co2 was at 20ppmv (Its now at 400 ppmv). All the talk about 97% consensus is based on absolutely bogus surveys, evidently served up as a distraction to avoid having to discuss the lack of evidence.showing co2 will have any influence on global warming.
Posted on: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 21:26:35 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015