Hamzah Khan, whose body lay undiscovered for almost two years after he was allowed to starve to death by his mother. Photograph: West Yorkshire police/PA An older brother of an invisible boy starved to death by their mother in Bradford complained to police and social services about physical and emotional abuse in the family home three years before the little boy died, an independent report has found. Hamzahs mother, Amanda Hutton, 44, was found guilty of his manslaughter and of neglecting six of her eight children. When Hamzahs partially mummified body was found in September 2011, almost two years after his death in December 2009, aged four, he was wearing a Babygro meant for a child aged six to nine months. The independent experts examining Hamzahs case also found that in late 2006, when Hamzah was one-and-a-half, one of his older siblings went to the police complaining that both Hutton and her partner had assaulted him. The boy made another complaint of physical and emotional abuse in May 2007 although at the time it was interpreted by social workers as being teenage angst rather than something more serious. He spent two nights in emergency accommodation before being returned back to the family home by the end of the month. Two years later Hamzah was dead, left to rot in his cot, his siblings told to lie to everyone and say he had moved to Portsmouth. The experts report that while much help was offered to Hamzahs mother, who was beaten up by her partner for much of their 22-year relationship, not enough focus was put on whether her children were safe and well. The SCR also found that social workers were too ready to accept Huttons word when she refused access to the family home. The following is all public record which can not be hidden or falsified since I possess unedited copies and have distributed them to prevent falsification: NH 10th Circuit Court public record case file 2008-DM-184 dated February 11, 2012 Lines 3 & 4: Respondent produced two copies of his NH Supreme Court brief and accompanying appendix (public case file 2011-0321) to the 10th Circuit Court on January 30, 2012 and hereby makes it a part hereof by reference in its entirety; 4. Appendix pages 802-806, made a part hereof by reference, prove incontrovertibly that the children told Dr. Tan they were struck with a bat and yet Ms. Kenick told DCYF not to interview the children and confirms that no one from DCYF in fact interviewed the children; NH Supreme Court case 2011-0321 Appellants Brief page 803 “Joseph said granddad hit him with a baseball bat because granddad was mad”…”Joseph mentioned being frustrated because mom does not drive him to his scout meetings. Dad is the scout leader, and Joseph feels his mom is trying to keep him from visiting with his dad.” School guidance counselor Diane Griffith is quoted on Page 805: “Joseph met with the guidance counselor today and stated that he has the freedom of speech at dads not at moms. Joseph states that he has told the counselor (Kathy Forbes Fisher) that he wants to live with his dad but that the counselor won’t listen. Joseph told Diane that his grandfather hit him so hard on the leg last summer that he had a bruise, then a few years prior he was hit with a bat” Yet the DCYF report states on Page 804: “this worker did not formally interview the children at the request of Ms. (Sarah Prescott) Kenick… Ms. Kenick indicated that the children have been interviewed about Joseph getting hit with a bat by the GAL Jennifer Rackley”. A notarized affidavit made public record by a former NH AG attorney on Page 585 clearly states “GAL Rackley was examined by the Respondent about her recommendations, and in her testimony, she indicated that she had no additional evidence to support her change of position from the report filed days earlier, NOR HAD SHE INVESTIGATED ANY OF THE INCIDENTS REGARDING ABUSES CLAIMED BY THE CHILDREN” Public-record NH 10th Circuit Court case 2008-DM-184 Certified Transcripts Page 519 Q: “Joseph was locked in the bathroom?” A: “Actually, Joseph didn’t discuss it with us . Rob (Prescott) was the one that…he was proud of the fact that he had locked Joseph in the bathroom for three hours” NH Supreme Court case 2011-0321 Appellants Brief notarized affidavit on Appendix Page 648 “I also have first hand knowledge regarding the Kenick children’s repeated plea for protection and relief from Ms. Kenick’s custody”…”MM Cross refused to allow ANY of Mr. Kenick’s twelve witnesses to testify. Where is justice for the children”…I was told by more than one witness in the courtroom that day that several of them have attended two, three, or more hearings, and the same injustice”…”For the safety and emotional well-being, SOMEONE from the Court or the State should listen to the children and immediately grant their plea to live with their father.” “I am writing to you as a member of the public who recently witnessed MM Cross on February 11, 2011 when he was presiding over the divorce hearing for Mr. & Mrs. Kenick. I left the court very disturbed with the judicial system, I felt that what I had just witnessed was nothing more than a kangaroo court… I took a day out of work, without pay to testify for Mr. Kenick, because I have knowledge of the complaints the children have made in repeatedly asking for relief from their mother’s custody….but Marital Master Cross denied to hear any of Mr. Kenicks witnesses.” - NH Supreme Court Case 2011-0321 Appellant’s Brief Appendix Page 723 NH 10th Circuit Court public record case 2008-Dm-184 July 16, 2012 Line 9 subpart-o. “Joe built and paid for it; the wife wrote in several deeds and a letter to the SBA flood people that she wants nothing to do with it. I know because I helped sort out and dry out piles of documents that were damaged in the Mother’s Day flood of 2006. I think the ex-wife’s interest now has to do with paying off student loans that she has allowed to build up by not paying them since way before the couple was married. Having paid off my loans with sacrifice and diligence, I would object to anyone essentially stealing property to pay off theirs… The judge uttered what seemed to be prescribed phrases to make it look like he’s impartial, but he certainly didn’t act impartial. I thought the whole business looked like a Carol Burnett or Saturday Night Live skit…If I had a say over where my NH taxes go, they would certainly not go to support that.” I will defend my children to the death, but I will never stop coming for them nor pay one dollar to fund, enable, encourage, or perpetuate the heinous judicial corruption and interagency cover ups now exposed!
Posted on: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 00:13:59 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015