Hey Facebook, perhaps you should drop the hypocritical behavior. Its nice that people are less offended by brown bag special women with saggy tits in bathtubs than they are a war vet who has overcome a disability and stands as a figurehead for the beauty of the male body and determination, but in the end- judgement calls like this really just make your moderators homophobic pieces of shit in the best of lights- and discriminating wastes of skin in the second best. There is no nudity here, and no one is forcing anyone who does not appreciate the aesthetic mastery of Michael Stokes Photography, his work, and his fitness models to go look at his page, or to follow it. The people who report things like that made a choice to seek out something they would find offensive. I find pro lifers and westboro supporters offensive, but I do not go looking for them to spoil my day. Banning someone from posting over content that is legally not nudity and able to be displayed in public to salve the feelings of someone who wants to attack that which they are too close minded to accept displays the complete intolerance of your company, despite those cute little PR announcements of being in full support of so many things. Stop supporting miserable people who do not love themselves or their life enough to stop turning their hate on the world around them. They made a conscious decision to go look for offensive material, and by removing those images, Facebook, as a company, is supporting that abhorrent forcing of conservative beliefs on others.
Posted on: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 04:42:01 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015