I am an advocate for the rule of law. I favour a broad bracket of liberties with a narrow border of acceptable latitudes. The authoritarian world would rather a narrow bracket of liberties, with a broad border of acceptable latitudes, and an arbitrary favoritist fringe of impunity. Apparently, the new anti-bullying statutes allow for allot of grey. I am sure that anyone who is not clear as to what a bully is, would be crystal clear about what a suck is. A suck is someone who dishes out what they cannot take. I am no suck. I know what I can take, and I know I cannot stupe so low as to dish out what I have taken. At seven years of age I was stripped naked and belted 10 times in front of all my dorm peers. For something everyone of them knew I did not do. I have had a tormentor wipe my blood off his hands with the scarf from around my neck. The water is fine come on in. You bunch of sucks! My species has bullies in it because contempt and disrespect are the new ethos of dominance. Why not look at how we bully ecology to see if there are any patterns of note. Corporations dont know their own strength, they were only flexing their muscles. They need the money, after all look at how many mouths they feed. Oh the environment can suck that up and get over it. Did you say something? Well well see to it you dont again. Anyone else want to say something? It is not the governments responsibility to intervene. If they cannot speak for themselves, they have nothing to say. This is a free country. Charitable agencies will deal with it. We run deficits because of bleeding heart spend thrifts. 17% of every donation gets borrowed from future generations. That is money that cannot be invested in environmental care. But environmentalists get good jobs. In fact garnering cash flow is the biggest industry in the public sector. Nothing gets done, but dont we have some nice salaries, beauty deficits to boot. How can we, who live in this glass house, throw stones at countries with corruption problems that hamper ecological preservation? Throw stones we do, because we love our bully culture. Our greatest evil is an equity grab borrowed from the future, based upon the singular assurance that it will take equity to adapt and survive the certain environmental collapse. Cynical evil. And who are the chief money grubbers driving this ethos? Remember the Eva Braun syndrome? No Tea Party women, no feminists, no this is a patriarchal corporate doing. Wrong. Last I checked, corporations operate in the black. You cannot keep your job there if you cannot understand a ledger. It is the political class, with all their time wasting meetings of analysis. Contrived complicity. It is those to whom the government slices the pork calling their fees, free enterprise competitiveness. Salivating boors in a trough elbowing the pigs away. More regulation is the call. Not from me. Why spend more on regulators who will do nothing but favour their cronies with a blind eye. What is called for is ethic to address ethos. Intelligence evolved as a moral structure. Corruption of this scale is indicative of genetic degeneration. A failure to mature and acquire ethical competencies. Let us go back to the rule of law. Even a bum on the street knows that you have a right to legal counsel when you are being bullied. The call to the Bar is not an accolade to those who are knowing and luminous. The call is firstly, to support not only the rule of law, but the intent of law. Secondly to insure that injustice does not prevail. I do not see any grey when it comes to the intent of anti-bullying legislation. What we need is competent lawyers and competent accountants to save us from the degeneracy of ethic.
Posted on: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 23:17:45 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015