I am really getting pissed off at stupid people who will read me - TopicsExpress



          

I am really getting pissed off at stupid people who will read me stating that I am quoting directly from the proposed oregon cannabis tax act, and then come back at me stating, well, thats not the way the law is. DUH!!!, but once we vote on this and pass it that is HOW THE LAW WILL BE. Stupid idiots. Here is a current situation - I have an OMMP card. Grandma has an OMMP card. I make Grandma some hand lotion with cannabis infused into it for her arthritus. Legal. Same situation under proposed Oregon Cannabis Tax Act - I do not have a card of any kind. I can have medicine. Grandma has no card. She can have medicine. But if I do not have a license to distribute cannabis through the OLCC and I give Grandma that lotion I am breaking commercial law. The verbage of the proposal is such that as long as a person does not do ANYTHING involving anyone else with the cannabis that they grow then they can grow their own. ANYTHING beyond that is going to be regulated with the rules and regulations being decided by the OLCC (Oregon Liquor Control Commission). The definition being used for financial consideration is... (5)(a) Financial Consideration, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, means value that is given or received directly or indirectly through sales, barter, trade, fees, charges, dues, contributions, or donations. ... So, as long as it fulfills the definition of financial consideration then the OLCC has authority over it. I am not going to go into the verbage that states that, but that is how it works out. The OLCC is also the group that decides if the action with cannabis is for financial consideration or not. So if I give Grandma some lotion and neither of us have a license to sell cannabis products then the OLCC needs to decide if we should have had a license or not. Lets see, Financial Consideration = (Value)(Given or Received)(Directly or Indirectly)(through Sales, Barter, Trade, Fees, Charges, Dues, Contributions, or Donations). This definition DOES NOT state that I actually have to receive anything for what I give, note the given or received part (in other words, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO HAVE BOTH). So for an act to be considered as an act of Financial Consideration four things have to happen. 1(Value) has to be 2(Given OR Received), 3(Directly OR Indirectly) through 4(Sales, Barter, Etc, DONATIONS (gifting is a form of donation)). So my medical lotion (Has Value) is gifted (Given) to grandma by myself (Directly) for free (Donation). Yep, that action has all four parts, so by a LEGAL point of view, that action is for Financial Consideration and that has Regulations, one of which is that you can NOT do actions for Financial Consideration without a license to do so. Any person who is happy about this measure proposal and is not part of our corrupt corporate empire is a complete idiot. Only those who really wish to limit and define and control MEDICINE are happy about this, well that and very stupid misguided idiots who are listening to those who want to rule and regulate and control your medicine. READ THIS FOR YOURSELF. The definition I gave is page four of petition #053. Which is the verbage behind measure 91 that Oregonians will be voting on November 4th, 2014. The full text is at the following link. oregonvotes.org/irr/2014/053text.pdf
Posted on: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 06:19:32 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015