I first learned this in 1970 in Federal District Court in Los Angeles, California, where I was criminally charged by the IRS with willful failure to file or pay income tax. I was there without an attorney. The IRS prosecutor started his case saying, “Citizens of the United States have an obligation to ….”, whereupon I stood and objected. The judge said, “Why are you objecting, he hasn’t said anything yet?” I said, “Well, he said citizens of the United States have obligations to do things which he was listing, and that may be true, but I contend he doesn’t have anything in his file to put me in that class.” The Judge, “Are you renouncing your citizenship?” Me, “How can I renounce that which I never applied for?” Judge, “Where were you born?” Me, “At the time of my birth I had just gone through a terrible ordeal, I was gasping for breath, I could neither read or write, I did not know where I was, who I was or even what I was.” Judge, “What did your mother tell you?” Me, “At the time of my birth I did not then understand child mother relationship, I could not pick my mother from a lineup of one.” Judge, “What was on your birth certificate?” Me, “At the time of my birth I did not then understand the importance of such a document. I don’t know if one was created at the time of my birth or not, and I deny that one was, and (pointing at the prosecutor), I said, and he can’t prove it.” Judge, “I am taking this matter under advisement and you will be notified.” That was 44 years ago and I am still waiting. I have never filed or paid income tax, and the IRS has never bothered me again. I have provided many letters presenting this to the IRS for many people over the years, many last year, and I have never been informed by anyone that they were ever again bothered by the IRS. This letter has also worked against state income tax collectors and traffic citations. My question here is if all of you had challenged the State of Missouri to present its proof from its files, that you had willingly, knowingly and intentionally, having been fully informed of the negative consequences thereof prior thereto, voluntarily agreed to submit yourselves to the political jurisdiction of the State of Missouri, as is required by the prohibition of involuntary servitude established in the Federal Thirteenth Amendment, the court would not have been able to proceed. There are at lease 20 Federal Appellate and Supreme Court cases that establish that once jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proved on the record, not merely claimed by the court. I think you had a couple of additional cases in your long presentation. One of those cases even establishes that jurisdiction can be challenged after conviction. You write that the authorities shut you down because of concerns of the Common Law Grand Jury. I am confident that you could not be more wrong. The government has no reason to fear the People’s Grand Juries or the GJ’s purported implementation of the common law; such juries are toothless! They have no significant power. At most, their “power” is limited to conducting investigations, into whatever they please and can fund out of their own pockets, and to issuing of indictments. They have absolutely no enforcement authority or power. They are totally at the mercy of the courts and legislatures, and executive branch. If a Grand Jury issues an indictment against some judge, and presents that indictment to a prosecutor or sheriff, and such indictment is ignored, the GJ is powerless to enforce it, other than to then issue an indictment against the prosecutor or sheriff or court, any and all of which can be ignored. In order for the GJ to be effective it must work with the system, not against it. As I wrote herein above, the Missouri courts that screwed you all around were acting as appropriate based on your failure to properly establish your political standing by challenging the prosecutor (NOT the court) to present its proof from its existing files, that any or all of you volunteered yourselves into some manner of subservience to the government. You are correct that your conviction was determined before you were arrested but not because of what you think. The reason was because the “system” knew you would not properly present a standing that would require the court to hear you, that you were all citizens who had applied for driver licenses and were so into the patriot nonsense that you would complain about gold fringe on the flag (meaningless) and your names being in all caps (meaningless) and continually spout the Constitution and Bill of Rights (all meaningless because of failure to properly establish standing as being of the People of the United States rather than being citizens or under subservient TLN contracts). I think the reason they went after you was because you were stirring everyone up, pointing out that everyone was being enslaved by the government rather than you telling people how thy were being enslaved by the government. The fact that the enslavement was due to the ignorance and failure of the general population to properly think through to determine the source of the government’s authority, makes no difference to an angry mob. The government had to do something to quiet down the angry mob. This was the same concern the IRS had in regard to its prosecution of me back in 1970. At that time I was a very effective leader in the income tax rebellion in Southern California. The IRS prosecuted me because I was convincing people that they did not have to file or pay income tax. By charging me they were able to discourage the tax rebellion. They never proved me wrong, but they did stop the rebellion. I think you could file an action against all those individuals who prosecuted you for criminal conspiracy based on the fraud that is ongoing in all the public schools of Missouri, where they are every day lying to the children, teaching them that they were born into United States citizenship and that they must have a driver license to drive their own automobile, all of which can easily be proven to be fraudulent. It comes here to my mind that in your lengthy writing you used the term united States, and mentioned your complaint of the gold fringe flag and the writing of your names in all capital letters. None of this had any legal effect in enabling your conviction – you were convicted because you failed to challenge the government (prosecutor) to present its proof that it was in full compliance with the Thirteenth Amendment! To present its proof that you had willingly, knowingly and intentionally, having been fully informed of the negative consequences thereof prior thereto, that you had voluntarily agreed to submit yourselves to the political jurisdiction of the State of Missouri, as would be required in order for the State to avoid a violation of the prohibition of involuntary servitude provision of the Federal Thirteenth Amendment. It is totally impossible for the state to present any such proof. What do you think? Jean’s Blog: jhaines6.wordpress - then click on the Common Law Issues link at the lower left of the picture of the clouds, at the top of the page. My Yahoo Group: groups.yahoo/group/whoru I am Eric Williams, The Radical In The Twilight Zone
Posted on: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 06:24:37 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015