Illuminati Doctrine - CHAOS LEADS TO OPPORTUNITY Out of manufactured chaos will be born the New World Order continue reading - multiple article stepping stones O.O eyes wide open O.O infowars/is-an-international-financial-conspiracy-driving-world-events-2/ Is an International Financial Conspiracy Driving World Events? Richard C. Cook, Global Research August 15, 2010 © 2010 Alex Jones . . . The lengthy Wikipedia article on Rockefeller provides the following version of a celebrated statement he allegedly made in an opening speech at the Bilderberg conference in Baden-Baden, Germany, in June 1991: We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during these years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government which will never again know war, but only peace and prosperity for the whole of humanity. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in the past centuries. . . . & “ ‘We are in the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.’ ” — David Rockefeller The governments of Europe, the United States, and Japan are unlikely to negotiate a social-democratic pattern of globalization – unless their hands are forced by a popular movement or a catastrophe, such as another Great Depression or ecological disaster” — Richard Sandbrook, Closing the Circle: Democratization and Development in Africa, Zed Books limited, London, 2000. The interests behind the Bush Administration such as the C.F.R., the Trilateral Commission founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller and the Bilderberg Group have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years.” — Dr. Johannes Cobel & infowars/enslavement.htm POLICE STATE III: TOTAL ENSLAVEMENT The United States government, at all levels has fallen under the control of the desperately wicked New World Order clan The events of Sept 11th mark the initiation of the final sick push of the illuminati to consolidate their one world order and transform earth into a prison planet. . . . & infowars/think-tank-extraordinary-crisis-needed-to-preserve-new-world-order/ Think Tank: “Extraordinary Crisis” Needed to Preserve “New World Order” Author of ‘shock and awe’ doctrine says elite threatened by non-state actors like Edward Snowden Paul Joseph Watson, Infowars January 17, 2014 at 6:09 am © 2013 Infowars is a Free Speech Systems, LLC company Writing for the Atlantic Council, a prominent think tank based in Washington DC, Harlan K. Ullman warns that an “extraordinary crisis” is needed to preserve the “new world order,” which is under threat of being derailed by non-state actors like Edward Snowden. The Atlantic Council is considered to be a highly influential organization with close ties to major policy makers across the world. It’s headed up by Gen. Brent Scowcroft, former United States National Security Advisor under U.S. Presidents Gerald Ford and George H. W. Bush. Snowcroft has also advised President Barack Obama. . . . In an article entitled War on Terror Is not the Only Threat, Ullman asserts that, “tectonic changes are reshaping the international geostrategic system,” arguing that it’s not military superpowers like China but “non-state actors” like Edward Snowden, Bradley Manning and anonymous hackers who pose the biggest threat to the “365 year-old Westphalian system” because they are encouraging individuals to become self-empowered, eviscerating state control. Very few have taken note and fewer have acted on this realization,” notes Ullman, lamenting that “information revolution and instantaneous global communications” are thwarting the “new world order” announced by U.S. President George H.W. Bush more than two decades ago. Without an extraordinary crisis, little is likely to be done to reverse or limit the damage imposed by failed or failing governance,” writes Ullman, implying that only another 9/11-style cataclysm will enable the state to re-assert its dominance while “containing, reducing and eliminating the dangers posed by newly empowered non-state actors.” Ullman concludes that the elimination of non-state actors and empowered individuals “must be done” in order to preserve the new world order. A summary of their material suggests that the Atlantic Council’s definition of a “new world order” is a global technocracy run by a fusion of big government and big business under which individuality is replaced by transhumanist singularity. Ullman’s rhetoric sounds somewhat similar to that espoused by Trilateral Commission co-founder and regular Bilderberg attendee Zbigniew Brzezinski, who in 2010 told a Council on Foreign Relations meeting that a “global political awakening,” in combination with infighting amongst the elite, was threatening to derail the move towards a one world government. Ullman’s implied call for an “extraordinary crisis” to reinvigorate support for state power and big government has eerie shades of the Project For a New American Century’s 1997 lament that “absent some catastrophic catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor,” an expansion of U.S. militarism would have been impossible. . . . & mindprod/politics/bush911quotes.html Quotations about 9-11 updated: 2006-10-01 by Roedy Green : ©2001-2006 Canadian Mind Products [Quotes from Adolph Hitler] The art of leadership. . . consists in consolidating the attention of the people against a single adversary and taking care that nothing will split up that attention. & abcnews.go/Politics/holder-terror-threat-widespread/story?id=18610592 Holder: Home-Grown Terrorists Threat Rivals Overseas By Chris Good (@c_good) , Jack Cloherty (@jjclo) , Jack Date and Jason A. Ryan Feb. 27, 2013 Copyright © 2013 ABC News Internet Ventures. Yahoo! - ABC News Network . . . I worry a little that the American people, from the general population, has become a little complacent that we don’t understand or realize that the threats are still real, that the danger is out there, is still tangible, that we still have to be as vigilant as we need to be,” [Eric] Holder said. . . . & The Washington Times Rumsfeld sets strategy in ‘war of ideas’ Advises renewed ‘sense of urgency’ on terror by Bill Gertz October 24, 2003 Section A pg. A1, Rumsfeld A16 . . . “ ‘It is human nature to have your mind focused by fear or necessity for a period—necessity is the mother of invention and fear focuses the mind. Both are true—and then time passes,” he [Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld] said. “And there’s a danger that that sense of urgency can ease and relax. . . . & C-SPAN Radio Live Broadcast March 23, 2004 The 9/11 Commission for the Investigation of the Terrorist Attacks on the United States The Eighth Public Hearing of the 9/11 Commission [One of a two day event] Testimony Secretary of State Colon Powell Colon Powell stated that he hopes the attacks in Spain, Malaysia, Indonesia, etc., etc. help gain support for the war on terror. Incidents like Spain should help us redouble our efforts, he said. & Daily News: Metro Edition pg. 8 New York’s Hometown Newspaper Panel Chiefs Concern Fearing 2nd Attack Pols may not act in time: Kean by James Gordon Meek May 23, 2004 It may take another catastrophe attack on America before there is the political will to fix problems with the nation’s intelligence and counterterrorism efforts, the chairman of the 9/11 commission told the Daily News. & cfr.org/publication/10633/ Council on Foreign Relations Link > By Publication Type Essential Documents Letter from President Mahmoud Ahmnadinejad to President George W. Bush May 7, 2006 Author: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad . . . Mr George Bush, President of the United States of America . . . “Mr President, . . . ... After 9.11, instead of healing and tending to the emotional wounds of the survivors and the American people – who had been immensely traumatised by the attacks – some Western media only intensified the climates of fear and insecurity – some constantly talked about the possibility of new terror attacks and kept the people in fear. ... American citizen lived in constant fear of fresh attacks that could come at any moment and in any place. They felt insecure in the streets, in their place of work and at home. Who would be happy with this situation? Why was the media, instead of conveying a feeling of security and providing peace of mind, giving rise to a feeling of insecurity? Some believe that the hype paved the way – and was the justification – for an attack on Afghanistan. Again I need to refer to the role of media. In media charters, correct dissemination of information and honest reporting of a story are established tenets. I express my deep regret about the disregard shown by certain Western media for these principles. The main pretext for an attack on Iraq was the existence of WMDs. This was repeated incessantly – for the public to, finally, believe – and the ground set for an attack on Iraq. . . . & Ron Paul On The Record The Texas Congressman’s best quotes on martial law, foreign policy, the economy and more Paul Joseph Watson, Prison Planet May 24, 2007 Copyright © 2002-2007 Alex Jones [in brackets added] . . . RON PAUL ON BIRD FLU To me it’s so strange that the President can make these proposals and it’s even plausible. When he talks about martial law dealing with some epidemic that might come later on and having forced quarantines, doing away with Posse Comitatus in order to deal with natural disasters, and hardly anybody says anything. People must be scared to death.’ ” I believe it is the President hyping this and Rumsfeld, but it has to be in combination with the people being fearful enough that they will accept the man on the white horse. My first reaction going from my political and medical background is that it’s way overly hyped and to think that they have gone this far with it, without a single case in the whole country and they’re willing to change the law and turn it into a military state? That is unbelievable! They’re determined to have martial law. & moneyfiles.org/quote.html MONEY FILES - FREEDOM AND TYRANNY, FAMOUS QUOTES – Mozilla Firefox [Sec. 107. - Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use notice] FAMOUS QUOTES: THE WORLD WANTS TO BE DECEIVED . . . The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed and hence, clamorous to be led to safety - by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary”—H.L. Mencken . . . & georgewashington.blogspot/2006/06/quotes.html June 1, 2006 Quotes War and Terror . . . As America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.” - Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Carter” Why of course the people don’t want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger.” - Hermann Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II . . . & Pg.1 washingtonpost/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/31/AR2007103103095.html Pg.2 washingtonpost/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/31/AR2007103103095_2.html From the Desk of Donald Rumsfeld . . . In Sometimes-Brusque ‘Snowflakes,’ He Shared Worldview, Shaped Policy By Robin Wright, Washington Post Staff Writer November 1, 2007; Page A01 © Copyright 1996-20072007 The Washington Post Company In a series of internal musings and memos to his staff, then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld...wrote of the need to “keep elevating the threat,” “link Iraq to Iran” and develop “bumper sticker statements” to rally public support for an increasingly unpopular war. . . . “Under siege in April 2006, when a series of retired generals denounced him and called for his resignation in newspaper op-ed pieces, Rumsfeld produced a memo after a conference call with military analysts. “Talk about Somalia, the Philippines, etc. Make the American people realize they are surrounded in the world by violent extremists,” he wrote. People will “rally” to sacrifice, he noted after the meeting. “They are looking for leadership. Sacrifice = Victory.” The meeting also led Rumsfeld to write that he needed a team to help him “go out and push people back, rather than simply defending” Iraq policy and strategy. “I am always on the defense. They say I do it well, but you can’t win on the defense,” he wrote. “We can’t just keep taking hits. . . . & telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2007%2F11%2F02%2Fwgulf402.xml Rumsfeld ‘kept up fear of terror attacks’ By Alex Spillius in Washington November 2, 2007 Last Updated: 2:34am GMT © Copyright of Telegraph Media Group Limited 2007 & prisonplanet/articles/november2007/021107_memos_prove.htm Memos Prove Rumsfeld Directed Psychological Terror Campaign Hyping climate of fear, threat of violence to achieve political objectives is the very definition of terrorism Paul Joseph Watson, Prison Planet November 2, 2007 Copyright 2002-2007 Alex Jones New Pentagon memos released by the Washington Post prove that ex-U.S. defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld directed a psychological campaign of terror in order to achieve political objectives, making Rumsfeld himself a terrorist according to the very definition of the term. Donald Rumsfeld, the former United States defence secretary, tried to maintain an atmosphere of fear in America as part of the Iraq war propaganda campaign, a series of leaked memos has shown,” reports the London Telegraph. In an April 2006 memo, Rumsfeld encouraged Pentagon officials to “Keep elevating the threat” and “Talk about Somalia, the Philippines etc. Make the American people realise they are surrounded in the world by violent extremists”. Rumsfeld also urged his staff to concoct “bumper sticker statements” (mindless cliches) in an attempt to garner continued support for the occupation of Iraq. In the most telling e mail, the former defense secretary ordered the Pentagon to “link Iraq to Iran,” heralding the birth of the now saturated propaganda talking point that Iran is fueling the violence in Iraq and helping to kill U.S. troops, despite the fact that British officials patrolling the Iran-Iraq border admit that there is “No concrete proof that Iran is supplying Iraq. . . . His insistence that an artificial climate of fear be maintained in America about the threat of new terror attacks in order to sell the unpopular war in Iraq are the smoking gun for criminal charges to be initiated.” By several of the very definitions of terrorism, Rumsfeld has provably engaged in terrorism, by hyping the threat of terror to achieve a political objective. . . . & georgewashington.blogspot/2006/06/quotes.html Thursday, June 01, 2006 Quotes War and Terror Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death.” - Adolf Hitler & thirdworldtraveler/Authors/Quotations_page_1.html Quotations page 1 – Mozilla Firefox It is ... necessary to whip up the population in support of foreign adventures. Usually the population is pacifist, just like they were during the First World War. The public sees no reason to get involved in foreign adventures, killing, and torture. So you have to whip them up. And to whip them up you have to frighten them.” - Noam Chomsky” Terrorism is the intentional use of, or threat to use violence against civilians or against civilian targets, in order to attain political aims.” - Boaz Ganor” Terrorism has replaced Communism as the rationale for the militarization of the country, for military adventures abroad, and for the suppression of civil liberties at home. It serves the same purpose, serving to create hysteria.” - Howard Zinn” The greatest threats to U.S. society are not coming from “terrorists” or “rogue nations” abroad. They are coming from the words and actions of elected officials here at home. Actions of the Department of Justice - emboldened by the USA-Patriot Act passed by Congress last fall - threaten to turn the U.S. into a permanent security state. - Friends Committee on National Legislation” & youtube/watch?v=T82Bq3qM-Wc&feature=share Rumsfeld: America Needs Another 9/11 Marc Moyer May 23, 2008 Copyright & thirdworldtraveler/Authors/Quotations_page_8.html Quotations page 8 . . . The trauma of 9/11 stimulated infinite possibilities for worry - some quite plausible, but most inspired by remote what-if fantasies. A society binging on fear makes itself vulnerable to far more profound forms of destruction than terror attacks. The “terrorism war”, like a nostalgic echo of the cold war, is using these popular fears to advance a different agenda - the re-engineering of American life through permanent mobilization.” - William Greider . . . & chebucto.ns.ca/CommunitySupport/NCC/SC4QUOT.html NCC Quotes I) The Problem With the Old World View Once a government resorts to terror against its own population to get what it wants, it must keep using terror against its own population to get what it wants. A government that terrorizes its own people can never stop. If such a government ever lets the fear subside and rational thought return to the populace, that government is finished.” — Michael Rivero & cnn/2008/POLITICS/07/02/terrorism.poll/index.html?eref=rss_topstories Poll: Terrorism fears are fading From Alan Silverleib, CNN July 2, 2008 © 2008 Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. & infowars/?p=3353 Wolfowitz: U.S. Confidence Hinges on Another ‘Crisis’ Former Deputy Secretary of Defense argues that America’s leadership role in the post-Bush world may depend upon ‘how threatening the world appears’ Aaron Dykes, Infowars July 16, 2008 © 2008 Alex Jones In a response to PNAC associate Robert Kagan, former Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz has suggested that a ‘compelling crisis’ such as Pearl Harbor or 9/11 may help bolster America’s stature in the world, which, Wolfowitz clearly hints, has been damaged by the Bush administration: America’s future leadership role may depend even more on how threatening the world appears. Historically, that leadership role has often emerged out of a compelling crisis: Pearl Harbour, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the Iran hostage crisis, Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, or the attacks of 9/11. Such a role would imply even more U.S. troops around the world and the need to maintain and even expand the state of crisis. In other words, it would be a continuation of the so-called ‘Wolfowitz Doctrine,’ a military-first approach to world dominance where the U.S. would function unilaterally as a pre-emptive security arm for world conflicts. ... . . . A NEW CATALYST Wolfowitz essentially gleans from Kagan that the solution to this problem of American fatigue could be a fresh crisis– which Wolfowitz indicates, would renew support and legitimize the U.S. presence around the world. Shockingly, Wolfowitz closely parallels recently unveiled comments Rumsfeld made that essentially welcome another terror attack. Indeed, both former Department of Defense heads show little patience for 9/11’s waning power to generate public support for the War on Terror. WOLFOWITZ: Paradoxically, the relative security which Americans have enjoyed since 2001 makes it easier to doubt the necessity of shouldering the burden of leadership. One hopes it will not take another calamity to convince us of the need for a vigilant foreign policy. RUMSFELD: This President’s pretty much a victim of success. We haven’t had an attack in five years. The perception of the threat is so low in this society that it’s not surprising that the behavior pattern reflects a low threat assessment. The same thing’s in Europe, there’s a low threat perception. The correction for that, I suppose, is an attack. And when that happens, then everyone gets energized for another [inaudible] and it’s a shame we don’t have the maturity to recognize the seriousness of the threats These statements are, without coincidence, very similar to what has become a strongly controversial quote in a PNAC– Project for a New American Century– September 2000 publication titled Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor PNAC has now been sufficiently exposed as the intellectual blueprint behind the Bush administration– the likes of Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz, all founding members, are now infamous to world leaders and informed dissidents everywhere as the architects of the fraudulent and now odorous wars against Terrorism, Afghanistan and most of all Iraq. This campaign of wars was justified almost exclusively by 9/11, which the Bush administration readily exploited and carefully manipulated, along with a handful of other lies (i.e. WMD). . . . Wolfowitz laments, although the idea of “coalitions of the willing” has taken a beating in recent years, there is no obvious substitute for it. In fact, Wolfowitz acknowledges that the concept may be a fragile basis for collective action and suggests that it would have to be stimulated through a shared sense of threat: While shared democratic values may help to draw such a coalition together, they are not necessarily the strongest link. A shared sense of threat… is not only the strongest motivating factor bringing countries together, but also the strongest deterrent to aggressive action by any regional power. . . . ...the affirmation of U.S. stature as the world’s only super-power necessarily depends upon further conflict and crisis– where American forces again and again step up as the “solution”– ensuring that America can never escape a state of perpetual conflict. & reuters/article/usDollarRpt/idUSL537969020081105?sp=true TOPWRAP 4-Obama urged to shape new economic order By Keith Weir, Additional reporting by Reuters bureaus worldwide, editing by Mike Peacock November 5, 2008 8:02am EST © Thomson Reuters 2008 . . . “ ‘We need to change the current crisis into a new opportunity. We need a new deal for a new world,” said European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso. “ ‘I sincerely hope that with the leadership of President Obama, the United States of America will join forces with Europe to drive this new deal,” he added. [nSP147482]” . . . & . . . “European leaders on Wednesday hailed Obama’s historic victory, saying they hoped the Democrat President-elect would usher in a new order of international cooperation between the EU and the US.” . . . France says Obama win “raises hope” . . . “French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner wished Obama “the greatest possible success” but also urged greater transatlantic cooperation: “Together we must seize this historic opportunity to combine our efforts to meet the economic, climate and security challenges that also face us all.’ ” . . . dw-world.de/dw/article/0,2144,3766057,00.html Europe Hails Obama Win, Calls for “New Deal” DW staff (kjb) November 5, 2008 © 2008 Deutsche Welle & prisonplanet/financial-times-editorial-admits-agenda-for-dictatorial-world-government.html Financial Times Editorial Admits Agenda For Dictatorial World Government Jaw-dropping report concedes that “global governance” is a euphemism for anti-democratic global government Paul Joseph Watson, Prison Planet Tuesday, December 9, 2008 PRISON PLANET. Copyright © 2002-2009 Alex Jones . . . For the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible,” writes Rachman, citing the financial crisis, “global warming” and the “global war on terror” as three major pretexts through which it is being introduced. Rachman writes that “global governance” could be introduced much sooner than many expect and that President elect Barack Obama has already expressed his desire to achieve that goal, making reference to Obama’s circle of advisors which includes Strobe Talbott, who in 1992 stated, “In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.” Rachman then concedes that the more abstract term “global governance,” which is often used by top globalists like David Rockefeller as a veil to offset accusations that a centralized global government is the real agenda, is merely a trick of “soothing language” that is used to prevent “people reaching for their rifles in America’s talk-radio heartland”. . . . Tellingly, Rachman concedes that “International governance tends to be effective, only when it is anti-democratic,” citing the continual rejection of EU expansion when the question is put to a vote. “In general, the Union has progressed fastest when far-reaching deals have been agreed by technocrats and politicians – and then pushed through without direct reference to the voters,” writes Rachman. So there you have it – one of the world’s top newspapers, editorially led by chief economics commentator Martin Wolf, a top Bilderberg luminary, openly proclaiming that not only is world government the agenda, but that world government will only be achieved through dictatorial measures because the majority of the people are dead against it. . . . & youtube/watch?v=dsUMnW_bye0&feature=related CNBC- Kissinger- Obama to use Crisis to create “New World Order” DontBeObamaZombies January 6, 2009 . . . What is the “New World Order” you ask??- It is the Elimination of the traditional, democratic Nation-State in favor of an all-powerful, centralized, dictatorial/fascist/socialist world government structure to be administered by the world central banks, top corporations and unelected (NGOs) Non-governmental organizations (UN, WTO, IMF, World Bank etc)- for the benefit of the agenda of private families who own controlling shares in the Central banks and Fortune 100 (“the Illuminati”, Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Morgans, British Royal family etc) This agenda is being pushed mainly by organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group- all which Kissinger is involved in (they also dominate the Obama administration). . . . & Obama: “We’re gonna get health care done. We’re gonna get clean air done. We are going to get climate change done.” (and …international objectives) “We are at a rare moment. We’ve been given the opportunity to remake our world for the better.” — President Barack Obama WCBM 680 A.M. Mark Levin Fox News Radion October 16, 2009 Excerpts from President Barack Obama – don’t know where speech occurred & noworldsystem/2009/10/17/obama-will-surrender-america-to-world-government/ Obama Will Surrender America To World Government NoWorldSystem October 17, 2009, 2:37 pm Blog at WordPress. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective – a New World Order – can emerge. . . Now, we can see a New World Order coming into view. A world in which there is a very real prospect for a New World Order. . .A world where the United Nations, freed from a Cold War stalemate, is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders.” - George H.W. Bush . . . With every passing day it becomes more evident that Obama is nothing more than a globalist, it is obvious from health care reform that he doesn’t care about the middle class, he is in the pocket of the internationalist elite like Kissinger and the rest of the global elite that wish to establish a World Government Dictatorship under the auspices of the United Nations. . . . We are beginning to see the emergence of a New World Order this year, with talks of a new global currency, a global climate tax, a global police force with access to a worldwide database of DNA, biometric and fingerprint records, an international gun-control treaty, an international criminal court treaty, the internet moving towards world government it’s crystal clear what is about to happen in this country. & noworldsystem/2009/11/23/eu-president-2009-is-the-first-year-of-global-governance/ EU President: 2009 is the “first year of global governance” Sees Copenhagen as step towards global management November 23, 2009, 2:21 pm Old-Thinker News The new EU President, Herman Van Rompuy, has proclaimed 2009 as the “first year of global governance.” During Rompuy’s intervention as President on November 19th, he stated, 2009 is also the first year of global governance, with the establishment of the G20 in the middle of the financial crisis. The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the global management of our planet. . . . & infowars/cnn-host-calls-deadly-terror-bombings-helpful-to-nwo-agenda/ CNN Host Calls Deadly Terror Bombings “Helpful” To NWO Agenda Paul Joseph Watson, Infowars July 13, 2010 © 2010 Alex Jones CNN host Rick Sanchez let slip a telling admission in response to the deadly bombings in Uganda during his show yesterday, the fact that such attacks are “helpful” for the military-industrial complex agenda to take over and occupy third world countries under AFRICOM, the United States African Command. Speaking with a former CIA agent, Sanchez stated, “You know what’s interesting about this, in a strange way the event is helpful to the cause of those of us who know how sadistic these fundamental radical Islamic terrorists are and if it helps get the message out there that these are not the good guys then so be it”. Sanchez is brazenly admitting that deadly terror attacks like the bombings in Uganda only aid the military-industrial complex agenda to take over and occupy third world countries. ... We heard similar rhetoric back in 2008 when shocking excerpts of confidential recordings released under the Freedom of Information Act featured former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld talking with top military analysts about how a flagging Neo-Con political agenda could be successfully restored with the aid of another terrorist attack on America. The tapes were released as part of the investigation into the Pentagon’s “message force multipliers” program in which top military analysts were hired to propagandize for the Iraq war in the corporate media. In the audio recording, Lt. Gen. Michael DeLong bemoans shrinking political support for Neo-Con war plans on Capitol Hill and suggests that sympathy for the military-industrial complex agenda will only be achieved after a new terror attack. Rumsfeld agrees that the psychological impact of 9/11 is wearing off and the “behavior pattern” of citizens in both the U.S. and Europe suggests that they are unconcerned about the threat of terror. DELONG: Politically, what are the challenges because you’re not going to have a lot of sympathetic ears up there until it [a terror attack] happens. RUMSFELD: That’s what I was just going to say. This President’s pretty much a victim of success. We haven’t had an attack in five years. The perception of the threat is so low in this society that it’s not surprising that the behavior pattern reflects a low threat assessment. The same thing’s in Europe, there’s a low threat perception. The correction for that, I suppose, is an attack. And when that happens, then everyone gets energized for another [inaudible] and it’s a shame we don’t have the maturity to recognize the seriousness of the threats…the lethality, the carnage, that can be imposed on our society is so real and so present and so serious that you’d think we’d be able to understand it, but as a society, the longer you get away from 9/11, the less…the less… In a similar vein to CNN’s Sanchez, Neo-Con writer Stu Bykofsky expressed his yearning for “another 9/11″ in order to “help America” restore its sense of “outrage and national resolve” in an August 2007 column for the Philadelphia Daily News. Lt.-Col. Doug Delaney, chair of the war studies program at the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ontario, told the Toronto Star in July 2007 that “The key to bolstering Western resolve is another terrorist attack like 9/11 or the London transit bombings of two years ago.” The same sentiment was also explicitly expressed in a 2005 GOP memo, which yearned for new attacks that would “validate” the President’s war on terror and “restore his image as a leader of the American people.” In June 2007, the chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party Dennis Milligan said that there needed to be more attacks on American soil for President Bush to regain popular approval. . . . & prisonplanet/top-clinton-official-only-a-terror-attack-can-save-obama.html Top Clinton Official: Only A Terror Attack Can Save Obama Bilderberger Shapiro says President needs new OKC or 9/11 as a way of “demonstrating that he is a leader” before November elections and reversing plunging approval ratings Paul Joseph Watson, Prison Planet July 14, 2010 Copyright © 2002-2009 Alex Jones . . . The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” said [Robert] Shapiro, adding, “He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that. ... Shapiro is now Director of the Globalization Initiative of NDN and also Chair of the Climate Task Force. He is a prominent globalist who has attended numerous Bilderberg Group meetings over the past decade. Shapiro is clearly communicating the necessity for a terror attack to be launched in order to give Obama the opportunity to unite the country around his agenda in the name of fighting terrorists, just as President Bush did in the aftermath of 9/11 when his approval ratings shot up from around 50% to well above 80%. Similarly, Bill Clinton was able to extinguish an anti-incumbent rebellion which was brewing in the mid 1990’s by exploiting the OKC bombing to demonize his political enemies as right-wng extremists. ... . . . CNN host Rick Sanchez admitted on his show this week that the deadly bombings in Uganda which killed 74 people were “helpful” to the military-industrial complex agenda to expand the war on terror into Africa. During the latter years of the Bush presidency, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld mused with Pentagon top brass that shrinking Capitol Hill support for expanding the war on terror could be corrected with the aid of another terror attack. Lt.-Col. Doug Delaney, chair of the war studies program at the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ontario, told the Toronto Star in July 2007 that “The key to bolstering Western resolve is another terrorist attack like 9/11 or the London transit bombings of two years ago. . . . Undoubtedly, the first people we should suspect as culprits in the event of a domestic terror attack in the United States are the individuals Obama fronts for, globalists who are desperate to neutralize the growing success of grass-roots movements who have ridden a wave of rising resentment against big government as a means of obtaining real political power. & landdestroyer.blogspot/2010/09/gordon-brown-on-non-existent-global.html Gordon Brown on the “Non-Existent” Global Government By Tony Cartalucci Saturday, September 4, 2010 Posted by Cartalucci Group at 10:08 PM That global ethic can infuse the fairness and responsibility that is necessary for these institutions to work, but we should not lose the chance in this generation, in this decade in particular, with President Obama in America, with other people working with us around the world, to create global institutions for the environment, and for finance, and for security and for development, that make sense of our responsibility to other peoples, our desire to bind the world together, and our need to tackle problems that everybody knows exist.” — Gordon Brown, Prime Minister UK” Gordon Brown is talking about what many people are calling global governance, or when they aren’t mincing words, global government. ... Global problems, they argue, need global solutions. Global problems like the H1N1 Swine Flu pandemic, which later turned out to be over-hyped by industry insiders. Global problems like the current economic melt down perpetrated by the very financial institutions and regulatory organizations seeking additional authority and consolidation with even less oversight than before. Global problems like “terrorism” and “conflict” that the globalists are firmly, undoubtedly behind. Indeed, they are proposing global government to solve these global problems, they themselves are making. These are immensely powerful people, the remnants of the European empires and the by-product of America’s “Manifest Destiny” seeking global consolidation through these “global institutions. ...the examples he uses to invoke our sympathy and support for his call for global institutionalization, are all contrived, engineered, or perpetrated by the elite he is a representative of. . . .
Posted on: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:04:01 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015