Im not an atheist. They give no good responses to challenges. But when apologists ask questions about things like what is the atheists standard of truth Im always wondering, What is yours? You can say God, but thats what youre intuiting, but what makes you think your intuition is correct here? You can claim that you cant know anything without direct revelation from someone who knows everything, but how are you arriving at your conclusion? You can claim experience, but that doesnt mean your conclusion is correct. People are wrong about their experiences all the time. Atheists often turn it around on presups, and Im glad they do this because apologists and atheists are in the same boat here. But it doesnt answer the presups question, from an atheist perspective, how do you determine truth? The theist at least has a response no matter how insubstantial it is. Atheists need to start catching up because theists are in the lead. And when youre losing to Christians, especially presuppers, you REALLY need to step up your game.
Posted on: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 21:41:18 +0000